Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

DART: Noise Injection for Robust Imitation Learning (1703.09327v2)

Published 27 Mar 2017 in cs.LG

Abstract: One approach to Imitation Learning is Behavior Cloning, in which a robot observes a supervisor and infers a control policy. A known problem with this "off-policy" approach is that the robot's errors compound when drifting away from the supervisor's demonstrations. On-policy, techniques alleviate this by iteratively collecting corrective actions for the current robot policy. However, these techniques can be tedious for human supervisors, add significant computation burden, and may visit dangerous states during training. We propose an off-policy approach that injects noise into the supervisor's policy while demonstrating. This forces the supervisor to demonstrate how to recover from errors. We propose a new algorithm, DART (Disturbances for Augmenting Robot Trajectories), that collects demonstrations with injected noise, and optimizes the noise level to approximate the error of the robot's trained policy during data collection. We compare DART with DAgger and Behavior Cloning in two domains: in simulation with an algorithmic supervisor on the MuJoCo tasks (Walker, Humanoid, Hopper, Half-Cheetah) and in physical experiments with human supervisors training a Toyota HSR robot to perform grasping in clutter. For high dimensional tasks like Humanoid, DART can be up to $3x$ faster in computation time and only decreases the supervisor's cumulative reward by $5\%$ during training, whereas DAgger executes policies that have $80\%$ less cumulative reward than the supervisor. On the grasping in clutter task, DART obtains on average a $62\%$ performance increase over Behavior Cloning.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Michael Laskey (18 papers)
  2. Jonathan Lee (30 papers)
  3. Roy Fox (39 papers)
  4. Anca Dragan (62 papers)
  5. Ken Goldberg (162 papers)
Citations (228)

Summary

Noise Injection for Robust Imitation Learning: Insights from DART

The paper "DART: Noise Injection for Robust Imitation Learning" details an innovative off-policy method designed to enhance the robustness of imitation learning by injecting noise into the supervisor's policy. Historically, Imitation Learning (IL) has struggled with the covariate shift, wherein the distribution of states encountered by the robot deviates from those seen during training, causing compounding errors during execution. DART (Disturbances for Augmenting Robot Trajectories) offers a novel solution by introducing deliberate disturbances in the form of noise during the supervisor's demonstrations. This approach encourages models to develop strategies for error recovery, which can be more practical and efficient than on-policy alternatives.

Key Contributions

The authors propose a targeted noise injection strategy to bridge the gap caused by the covariate shift. This method optimizes the level of injected noise to align closely with the errors expected in the robot’s trained policy. The core contributions are as follows:

  1. Algorithm Development: DART is introduced as a new algorithm to inject noise into supervisor demonstrations, effectively preparing the model to handle distribution shifts it will encounter during real-world deployment.
  2. Theoretical Analysis: The paper provides a comprehensive theoretical analysis that demonstrates how DART can outperform traditional Behavior Cloning by minimizing the covariate shift.
  3. Empirical Evaluation: Extensive empirical evaluations are conducted using simulation environments (MuJoCo locomotion tasks) as well as real-world scenarios (robotic grasping), showing that DART can significantly improve performance over Behavior Cloning and even match the efficacy of on-policy methods like DAgger with less computational overhead.

Experimental Insights

The performance of DART was tested in various high-dimensional tasks using simulation environments such as MuJoCo, covering domains like Walker, Hopper, Humanoid, and Half-Cheetah. In such tasks, DART achieved computation efficiency, managing to reach the desired performance level three times faster than DAgger in some instances. This is particularly significant in computationally intensive environments like Humanoid, where maintaining high rewards during training while efficiently managing supervisor time is crucial. Further, empirical tests involving human supervisors training a Toyota HSR robot in a grasping task validated DART’s applicability in real-world scenarios, achieving a marked improvement in performance.

Implications and Future Prospects

The DART algorithm's success points to several implications and potential future developments in the domain of AI, particularly in imitation learning:

  • Practical Application in Dangerous or Costly Domains: The ability to simulate and mitigate errors through noise injection without on-policy risks makes DART highly applicable in scenarios where safety and cost constraints are predominant.
  • Reduction in Human Supervisor Burden: By reducing the requirement for corrective input from human supervisors, DART could present a scalable solution in fields such as autonomous driving and robotic manipulation, where expert supervision is a significant bottleneck.
  • Enhanced Learning in High-Dimensional Spaces: The approach’s effectiveness in high-dimensional settings, as demonstrated in MuJoCo tasks, suggests potential for extending this methodology to complex real-world applications like industrial automation and medical robotics.

The paper presents significant evidence on the advantages of strategically optimized noise injection and lays the groundwork for subsequent research to further refine and utilize this methodology in varied applications. With ongoing advancements, DART may well become a preferred choice for robust and efficient imitation learning in domains where safety, time, and computational resources are of the essence.