Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Multitask learning and benchmarking with clinical time series data (1703.07771v3)

Published 22 Mar 2017 in stat.ML and cs.LG

Abstract: Health care is one of the most exciting frontiers in data mining and machine learning. Successful adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) created an explosion in digital clinical data available for analysis, but progress in machine learning for healthcare research has been difficult to measure because of the absence of publicly available benchmark data sets. To address this problem, we propose four clinical prediction benchmarks using data derived from the publicly available Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database. These tasks cover a range of clinical problems including modeling risk of mortality, forecasting length of stay, detecting physiologic decline, and phenotype classification. We propose strong linear and neural baselines for all four tasks and evaluate the effect of deep supervision, multitask training and data-specific architectural modifications on the performance of neural models.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Hrayr Harutyunyan (19 papers)
  2. Hrant Khachatrian (19 papers)
  3. David C. Kale (7 papers)
  4. Greg Ver Steeg (95 papers)
  5. Aram Galstyan (142 papers)
Citations (802)

Summary

  • The paper introduces standardized benchmark tasks using MIMIC-III for assessing multitask learning in predicting clinical outcomes.
  • It leverages LSTM and channel-wise architectures to improve accuracy in predicting in-hospital mortality, decompensation, LOS, and phenotype classification.
  • Multitask learning with deep supervision yields statistically significant improvements, paving the way for robust evaluation and further research in healthcare ML.

Multitask Learning and Benchmarking with Clinical Time Series Data

The paper "Multitask learning and benchmarking with clinical time series data" by Harutyunyan et al. addresses the pressing need for standardized benchmarks in the application of machine learning to clinical data. The absence of such benchmarks has hindered progress in the field, by limiting reproducibility and the ability to objectively compare results. Leveraging data derived from the MIMIC-III database, the authors propose four clinical prediction benchmarks, covering in-hospital mortality, physiologic decompensation, length of stay (LOS), and phenotype classification.

Benchmark Tasks and Methodology

In-Hospital Mortality Prediction

The first benchmark task is predicting in-hospital mortality based on the first 48 hours of an ICU stay. The primary metric used is the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC). The dataset includes over 21,000 ICU stays, with the mortality rate being 13.23%, thus providing a reliable basis for comparative evaluation.

Physiologic Decompensation Prediction

The second task involves predicting decompensation, defined here as the likelihood of mortality within the next 24 hours at any given point during an ICU stay. This task generates hourly prediction instances, resulting in a large dataset with over 3 million instances. Similar to the first task, the main metric is AUC-ROC.

Length of Stay Prediction

Length of stay prediction, the third task, aims to forecast the remaining time a patient will spend in the ICU. This is framed as a classification problem with ten distinct classes, capturing buckets of lengths-of-stay from less than one day to more than two weeks. A nuanced metric, Cohen's linear weighted kappa, is employed alongside mean absolute deviation (MAD) to evaluate performance comprehensively.

Phenotype Classification

The final benchmark task addresses phenotype classification, identifying 25 different acute care conditions from ICU stay records. This multilabel classification problem uses macro-averaged AUC-ROC as the primary metric, reflecting the complexity and variability across phenotypes with diverging prevalence and counterpart clinical presentations.

Model Architectures and Results

The authors explore both linear models and various neural network architectures, with a focus on LSTM-based models due to their efficacy in handling time series data. Baselines include standard LSTM and an innovative channel-wise LSTM, which processes each variable independently using separate LSTM layers before concatenating the outputs.

Numerical Results

LSTM-based models significantly outperform linear models across all tasks, demonstrating the robustness of this architecture in capturing the intricacies of clinical time series data. For instance, in in-hospital mortality prediction, LSTM models achieve an AUC-ROC of about 0.88, whereas logistic regression models linger around 0.85. The introduction of channel-wise LSTM further improves results, capitalizing on the independent processing of clinical variables.

Multitask Learning and Deep Supervision

A notable contribution of this paper is the multitask learning framework, which trains a single model to perform multiple prediction tasks simultaneously. This approach leverages potential correlations between tasks, such as the interplay between decompensation and extended LOS, to regularize the learning process and improve performance. Theoretical analysis and empirical results show that multitask learning yields statistically significant performance improvements in multiple tasks, notably decompensation and LOS prediction.

Deep supervision, another innovative strategy, involves enforcing predictions at multiple time steps within each ICU stay, enhancing the learning of long-term dependencies. For instance, in the LOS prediction task, deeply supervised LSTM models notably outperform standard LSTMs, indicating the value of this granular supervision in time-series forecasting.

Implications and Future Research

The benchmark tasks and methodologies proposed in this paper have several implications. Practically, they facilitate the objective comparison of machine learning models in the healthcare domain, thus accelerating progress. Theoretically, the tasks span a range of machine learning problems, from classification to regression, providing a diverse and rich domain for future model innovation.

This work also opens avenues for exploring the generalization of trained models to other clinical datasets beyond MIMIC-III. Future research could adopt transfer learning paradigms to adapt models trained on these benchmarks to other datasets or settings, thus evaluating their robustness and adaptability.

Furthermore, dynamic adaptation of loss coefficients during multitask learning, as well as deeper insights into the regularization effects of channel-wise processing, represent exciting directions for advancing the state of the art in multitask learning.

Conclusion

The provision of standardized benchmarks as proposed in this paper is crucial for the systematic advancement of machine learning in healthcare. Harutyunyan et al. provide a valuable resource that includes robust baselines and a multitask learning framework that can be a foundation for future research. The strong empirical results, extensive dataset, and the novel methodological contributions make this work a significant asset for the research community focused on leveraging machine learning for clinical improvements.