Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Comparison of deep learning methods for environmental sound (1703.06902v1)

Published 20 Mar 2017 in cs.SD and cs.LG

Abstract: Environmental sound detection is a challenging application of machine learning because of the noisy nature of the signal, and the small amount of (labeled) data that is typically available. This work thus presents a comparison of several state-of-the-art Deep Learning models on the IEEE challenge on Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events (DCASE) 2016 challenge task and data, classifying sounds into one of fifteen common indoor and outdoor acoustic scenes, such as bus, cafe, car, city center, forest path, library, train, etc. In total, 13 hours of stereo audio recordings are available, making this one of the largest datasets available. We perform experiments on six sets of features, including standard Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC), Binaural MFCC, log Mel-spectrum and two different large- scale temporal pooling features extracted using OpenSMILE. On these features, we apply five models: Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), Deep Neural Network (DNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Convolutional Deep Neural Net- work (CNN) and i-vector. Using the late-fusion approach, we improve the performance of the baseline 72.5% by 15.6% in 4-fold Cross Validation (CV) avg. accuracy and 11% in test accuracy, which matches the best result of the DCASE 2016 challenge. With large feature sets, deep neural network models out- perform traditional methods and achieve the best performance among all the studied methods. Consistent with other work, the best performing single model is the non-temporal DNN model, which we take as evidence that sounds in the DCASE challenge do not exhibit strong temporal dynamics.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Juncheng Li (121 papers)
  2. Wei Dai (230 papers)
  3. Florian Metze (80 papers)
  4. Shuhui Qu (14 papers)
  5. Samarjit Das (12 papers)
Citations (118)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.