Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Structured Sequence Modeling with Graph Convolutional Recurrent Networks (1612.07659v1)

Published 22 Dec 2016 in stat.ML and cs.LG

Abstract: This paper introduces Graph Convolutional Recurrent Network (GCRN), a deep learning model able to predict structured sequences of data. Precisely, GCRN is a generalization of classical recurrent neural networks (RNN) to data structured by an arbitrary graph. Such structured sequences can represent series of frames in videos, spatio-temporal measurements on a network of sensors, or random walks on a vocabulary graph for natural LLMing. The proposed model combines convolutional neural networks (CNN) on graphs to identify spatial structures and RNN to find dynamic patterns. We study two possible architectures of GCRN, and apply the models to two practical problems: predicting moving MNIST data, and modeling natural language with the Penn Treebank dataset. Experiments show that exploiting simultaneously graph spatial and dynamic information about data can improve both precision and learning speed.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Youngjoo Seo (3 papers)
  2. Michaƫl Defferrard (13 papers)
  3. Pierre Vandergheynst (72 papers)
  4. Xavier Bresson (40 papers)
Citations (714)

Summary

  • The paper proposes GCRNs that integrate graph convolutions with recurrent neural networks to effectively capture spatio-temporal dependencies.
  • Experimental results show that GCRNs outperform traditional models on Moving MNIST and Penn Treebank by leveraging graph-based spatial constraints and dropout.
  • The study demonstrates that extending convolutional operations to non-Euclidean domains can lead to more robust and efficient sequence prediction.

Structured Sequence Modeling with Graph Convolutional Recurrent Networks

The paper under review introduces Graph Convolutional Recurrent Networks (GCRNs), a novel approach to modeling structured sequences in data represented by arbitrary graphs. GCRNs amalgamate convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for spatial pattern identification and recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for temporal dynamics, offering a powerful tool for complex data dependencies.

Core Contributions

The GCRN model is particularly adept at forecasting in settings where observations are linked by graph structures, such as in video sequences, sensor networks, or even linguistic models through vocabulary graphs. Two architectures of GCRNs are proposed: one combining a graph CNN with an LSTM, and another extending the convLSTM architecture to graphs. These architectures leverage graph convolutions to enhance both precision and learning speed, as demonstrated in their experimental results.

Experimental Validation

The authors thoroughly tested the GCRN architectures on two datasets:

  1. Moving MNIST Dataset: This task involves predicting the motion of digits within video sequences. GCRNs showed notable performance improvements over traditional CNNs, particularly when employing larger graph convolutions, indicating a better representation of spatio-temporal features.
  2. Penn Treebank Dataset: Here, the emphasis was on natural LLMing. GCRNs utilizing a graph-structured representation of vocabulary improved predictive abilities, especially when augmented by dropout for regularization, evidencing the utility of graph-based spatial constraints.

Theoretical Implications

The paper implies that graph convolutional methodologies can generalize convolutional operations beyond traditional grid data, addressing the limitations of Euclidean assumptions in spatial convolutions. This contributes to more robust sequence modeling across various domains, particularly those with non-Euclidean spatial relationships.

Moreover, the isotropic property of graph filters offers a potentially less parameter-intensive yet effective alternative, which may be advantageous in resource-constrained scenarios.

Numerical Outcomes

The paper provides specific numerical results highlighting the competency of GCRNs. Noteworthy is the reduction in test perplexity in LLMing tasks when GCRNs are combined with dropout, surpassing standard LSTM implementations. This suggests that incorporating spatial semantics through vocabulary graphs enhances the model's understanding and predictive capabilities.

Future Directions

The paper points towards several promising future avenues:

  • Application to Dynamic Graphs: Exploring GCRN applications where the graph topology itself is time-variant, such as in social networks or brain activity data.
  • Stability Analysis: Investigating how graph-structured modeling could enhance the stability of RNNs and mitigate issues such as vanishing gradients in long sequences.
  • Accelerated Learning: Further exploration of the impact of GCRNs on learning efficiency in large-scale LLMs, possibly offering a faster alternative to existing methodologies.

In conclusion, the introduction of GCRNs represents a significant step in the evolution of sequence modeling on structured data. Through effective fusion of spatial and temporal information via graph convolutions, GCRNs demonstrate a versatile framework that can be extended to multiple domains, opening new potential in both research and practical applications.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com