Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
129 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Sampling Random Spanning Trees Faster than Matrix Multiplication (1611.07451v2)

Published 22 Nov 2016 in cs.DS

Abstract: We present an algorithm that, with high probability, generates a random spanning tree from an edge-weighted undirected graph in $\tilde{O}(n{4/3}m{1/2}+n{2})$ time (The $\tilde{O}(\cdot)$ notation hides $\operatorname{polylog}(n)$ factors). The tree is sampled from a distribution where the probability of each tree is proportional to the product of its edge weights. This improves upon the previous best algorithm due to Colbourn et al. that runs in matrix multiplication time, $O(n\omega)$. For the special case of unweighted graphs, this improves upon the best previously known running time of $\tilde{O}(\min{n{\omega},m\sqrt{n},m{4/3}})$ for $m \gg n{5/3}$ (Colbourn et al. '96, Kelner-Madry '09, Madry et al. '15). The effective resistance metric is essential to our algorithm, as in the work of Madry et al., but we eschew determinant-based and random walk-based techniques used by previous algorithms. Instead, our algorithm is based on Gaussian elimination, and the fact that effective resistance is preserved in the graph resulting from eliminating a subset of vertices (called a Schur complement). As part of our algorithm, we show how to compute $\epsilon$-approximate effective resistances for a set $S$ of vertex pairs via approximate Schur complements in $\tilde{O}(m+(n + |S|)\epsilon{-2})$ time, without using the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma which requires $\tilde{O}( \min{(m + |S|)\epsilon{-2}, m+n\epsilon{-4} +|S|\epsilon{-2}})$ time. We combine this approximation procedure with an error correction procedure for handing edges where our estimate isn't sufficiently accurate.

Citations (70)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.