Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Neuro-Symbolic Program Synthesis (1611.01855v1)

Published 6 Nov 2016 in cs.AI and cs.PL

Abstract: Recent years have seen the proposal of a number of neural architectures for the problem of Program Induction. Given a set of input-output examples, these architectures are able to learn mappings that generalize to new test inputs. While achieving impressive results, these approaches have a number of important limitations: (a) they are computationally expensive and hard to train, (b) a model has to be trained for each task (program) separately, and (c) it is hard to interpret or verify the correctness of the learnt mapping (as it is defined by a neural network). In this paper, we propose a novel technique, Neuro-Symbolic Program Synthesis, to overcome the above-mentioned problems. Once trained, our approach can automatically construct computer programs in a domain-specific language that are consistent with a set of input-output examples provided at test time. Our method is based on two novel neural modules. The first module, called the cross correlation I/O network, given a set of input-output examples, produces a continuous representation of the set of I/O examples. The second module, the Recursive-Reverse-Recursive Neural Network (R3NN), given the continuous representation of the examples, synthesizes a program by incrementally expanding partial programs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by applying it to the rich and complex domain of regular expression based string transformations. Experiments show that the R3NN model is not only able to construct programs from new input-output examples, but it is also able to construct new programs for tasks that it had never observed before during training.

An Analysis of Neuro-Symbolic Program Synthesis for String Transformation Tasks

The paper "Neuro-Symbolic Program Synthesis" presents a novel approach to the challenge of program synthesis, a key problem in artificial intelligence and machine learning, specifically focusing on transforming regular expressions based on string manipulation tasks. The proposed method overcomes several limitations of conventional neural architectures for program induction, which are often computationally intensive, require task-specific training, and produce results that are opaque and difficult to verify. The research improvises on these limitations by introducing the concept of Neuro-Symbolic Program Synthesis (NSPS), which integrates neural network paradigms with symbolic reasoning to synthesize human-readable programs in response to input-output examples.

Methodology and Model Architecture

The proposed methodology is underpinned by two neural modules: a cross-correlation input-output (I/O) network and the Recursive-Reverse-Recursive Neural Network (R3NN). The cross-correlation I/O network generates continuous representations of given example pairs. The R3NN then utilizes this representation to explore program space by incrementally synthesizing programs. This synthesis is performed by expanding partial programs within the specified domain-specific language (DSL), leveraging a tree-structured neural architecture.

The R3NN is a key innovation here. It conducts both recursive and reverse-recursive passes that effectively encode and decode partial program trees, respectively. This dual mechanism ensures that the generated programs are sensitive to the overall structure of the input-output examples, operating within the constraints of the provided DSL.

Experimental Validation and Findings

The efficacy of the proposed approach was demonstrated on tasks composed of regular expression-based string transformations. The experimental results are compelling, with the NSPS being capable of synthesizing functional programs for 63% of previously unseen tasks during testing and 94% when exploiting a sample set of 100 programs. Moreover, the R3NN model exhibited strong generalization capabilities, constructing programs for 38% of a set of 238 real-world benchmarks, highlighting its utility in practical applications such as Microsoft Excel FlashFill tasks.

The experiments underline the importance of the two major contributions of the paper: the cross-correlation based continuous representation learning and the tree-shaped generative model. By capitalizing on the inherent structure of the DSL, NSPS achieves superior results compared to previous enumeration-based methods, which suffer from scalability issues.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this research are multifaceted. From a theoretical standpoint, the integration of neural networks with symbolic reasoning opens up pathways for more interpretable machine learning models, potentially addressing the interpretability challenges commonly associated with deep learning networks. Practically, this approach has immediate applications in automating programming tasks, reducing manual coding efforts, and expediting software development cycles.

For future work, the authors hint at the potential for extending NSPS to learn from weaker supervision, where explicit program outputs are not provided but programs must still be synthesized to match input-output behaviors. This could involve employing reinforcement learning frameworks, thereby enhancing the model's adaptability and learning efficiency.

In conclusion, the paper makes significant strides in program synthesis by leveraging deep learning advancements and symbolic methods, laying a foundation for more sophisticated program induction frameworks that are both efficient and interpretable. This paper successfully bridges the gap between neural perception and symbolic manipulation, setting the stage for advances in automated program synthesis.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Emilio Parisotto (24 papers)
  2. Abdel-rahman Mohamed (10 papers)
  3. Rishabh Singh (58 papers)
  4. Lihong Li (72 papers)
  5. Dengyong Zhou (20 papers)
  6. Pushmeet Kohli (116 papers)
Citations (308)