Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Predicting Band Gaps with Hybrid Density Functionals (1608.04796v3)

Published 16 Aug 2016 in cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Abstract: We compare the ability of four popular hybrid density functionals (B3LYP, B3PW91, HSE, and PBE0) for predicting band gaps of semiconductors and insulators over a large benchmark set using a consistent methodology. We observe no significant statistical dference in their overall performance although the screened hybrid HSE is more accurate for typical semiconductors. HSE can improve its accuracy for large large band gap materials --without affecting that of semiconductors-- by including a larger portion of Hartree-Fock exchange in its short range. Given that screened hybrids are computationally much less expensive than their global counterparts, we conclude that they are a better option for the black box prediction of band gaps.

Citations (384)

Summary

  • The paper evaluates four hybrid density functionals using rigorous statistical measures to predict electronic band gaps in semiconductors and insulators.
  • The paper finds that HSE achieves high accuracy for semiconductors by adjusting the short-range Hartree-Fock exchange while keeping computational costs low.
  • The paper shows that while B3LYP, B3PW91, and HSE yield similar error profiles, PBE0 tends to overestimate band gaps, guiding future functional tuning.

Predicting Band Gaps with Hybrid Density Functionals

The paper "Predicting Band Gaps with Hybrid Density Functionals" by Alejandro J. Garza and Gustavo E. Scuseria presents a comprehensive evaluation of various hybrid density functionals for predicting the band gaps of semiconductors and insulators. The authors assess the performance of four widely-used hybrid functionals: B3LYP, B3PW91, HSE, and PBE0. Their comparison is based on a significant benchmark set using a consistent methodology, aiming to elucidate which functional most accurately models electronic band gaps with a balance between computational cost and accuracy.

Key Findings

The analysis reveals no substantial statistical difference in the overall performance among the examined hybrid functionals, although minor differences were noted in specific contexts:

  • HSE Functionality: The HSE functional is highlighted as particularly accurate for semiconductors and can be adjusted to improve accuracy for materials with larger band gaps by incorporating an increased portion of Hartree-Fock (HF) exchange in its short range. Efficacy is attributed to its computational efficiency compared to global hybrids.
  • Comparison of Functionals: B3LYP, B3PW91, and HSE display similar error measures for band gap calculations, while PBE0 shows a tendency to overestimate band gaps. The addition of HF exchange in the short range for HSE functionals offers a practical improvement for accurately modeling larger band gap insulators without worsening semiconductor accuracy.
  • Statistical Evaluation: The personalized assessment includes a variety of error statistics such as Mean Error, Mean Absolute Error, and Mean Absolute Percent Error to ensure a comprehensive comparison. The statistical analysis employs robust statistical measures and examines the rank correlation and trends of errors to validate their findings.

Implications and Future Directions

The research suggests that while different hybrids show variable accuracy across diverse materials, the HSE functional stands out due to its balance of computational cost-effectiveness and precision, especially for standard semiconductors. These insights are critical for materials scientists and chemists who seek accurate, efficient band gap predictions in their computational models.

Future Prospects in AI and Computational Chemistry

As hybrid functionals continue to evolve, future work could involve automation tools that dynamically adjust exchange parameters specific to the material being studied. The increasing integration of machine learning techniques in computational chemistry holds potential for refining functional parameters based on large datasets, enhancing predictive performance beyond current methods. Furthermore, investigating advanced models for adapting hybrid functionals could lead to the development of universally applicable hybrids, proficient across varied substrates and environments.

In conclusion, Garza and Scuseria’s paper provides a nuanced appraisal of hybrid functionals for band gap predictions, advocating for the HSE functional due to its overall performance. Future efforts could explore real-time tuning of these functionals, potentially leveraging AI to provide superior predictions with reduced computational demands.