Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Tasks
This paper presents a detailed exploration of sentence embeddings, focusing on understanding the capabilities of various sentence representation mechanisms. The central issue addressed is the lack of clarity regarding the types of information captured by sentence embeddings. To investigate this, the authors propose an analytical framework utilizing auxiliary prediction tasks to assess the encoding of sentence length, word content, and word order.
Methodology
The paper introduces three prediction tasks as metrics for evaluating sentence embeddings:
- Length Prediction: Classifiers predict sentence length from its embedding, categorized into specific bins.
- Word-content Prediction: Determines whether a given word vector appears in the encoded sentence.
- Word-order Prediction: Assesses the order of words based on their vectors.
Using these auxiliary tasks, the paper evaluates various embedding models, such as Continuous Bag-of-Words (CBOW) and LSTM-based encoder-decoder architectures. Skip-thought vectors are also examined for comparative insights.
Key Findings
- CBOW Effectiveness: Despite being a simple model, CBOW embeddings were unexpectedly informative. They encoded a significant amount of sentence length and word order information, highlighting their utility in tasks reliant on content and ordering patterns.
- LSTM Auto-encoders: These models showed strong performance in encoding both word content and order. Performance improvements were noted with increased embedding dimensions, though with diminishing returns beyond a certain threshold.
- Impact of Dimensionality: Increasing the number of dimensions often enhanced the encoding quality, yet the benefits varied across tasks. Importantly, beyond 750 dimensions, a degradation in word content accuracy was observed, suggesting a non-linear relationship between dimensionality and performance.
- Skip-thought Vectors: While effective, skip-thought vectors exhibited a reliance on natural sentence ordering. This was contrasted with LSTM auto-encoders, which maintained robust encoding capabilities even with permuted input sequences.
- Natural Language Inferences: Through additional experimentation with synthetically permuted sentences, the paper showed that certain models, particularly the CBOW, leverage inherent word order patterns present in natural language.
Implications and Future Directions
The results have significant implications for both practical applications and theoretical research. The ability to dissect sentence embeddings into finer components offers a pathway to better understand and refine embedding techniques. Practically, this facilitates the development of more targeted models for specific NLP tasks, considering the inherent strengths and weaknesses identified for each embedding method.
For future research, expanding the analysis to encompass higher-level syntactic and semantic properties could provide a more comprehensive understanding of sentence embeddings. Additionally, investigating the utility of embedding models across varied languages and sentence structures could offer further insights into their generalizability and adaptability.
In summary, this paper adds a crucial layer of understanding to the properties encoded by different sentence embedding models, offering valuable tools and methodologies for future exploration in natural language processing and machine learning.