Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep Learning with Differential Privacy (1607.00133v2)

Published 1 Jul 2016 in stat.ML, cs.CR, and cs.LG

Abstract: Machine learning techniques based on neural networks are achieving remarkable results in a wide variety of domains. Often, the training of models requires large, representative datasets, which may be crowdsourced and contain sensitive information. The models should not expose private information in these datasets. Addressing this goal, we develop new algorithmic techniques for learning and a refined analysis of privacy costs within the framework of differential privacy. Our implementation and experiments demonstrate that we can train deep neural networks with non-convex objectives, under a modest privacy budget, and at a manageable cost in software complexity, training efficiency, and model quality.

An Essay on "Deep Learning with Differential Privacy" by Abadi et al.

The academic paper titled "Deep Learning with Differential Privacy" authored by Martı́n Abadi and colleagues addresses a pressing concern in the domain of machine learning: the potential leakage of sensitive information from large training datasets. This work merges state-of-the-art deep learning techniques with advanced mechanisms for differential privacy (DP), presenting novel algorithmic solutions and refined privacy cost analyses within the DP framework. The authors underscore their contributions via a meticulous investigation of the computational efficiency, software complexity, and model quality impacts when integrating differential privacy into deep neural networks (DNNs).

Introduction

The paper sets the stage by highlighting the remarkable successes of neural network-based machine learning systems across various applications, including image classification, language representation, and game AI. However, these successes often lean on large, representative datasets, which may contain sensitive information. Abadi et al. emphasize the need for training methods that provide strong privacy guarantees. They propose new algorithmic techniques for training neural networks under a modest privacy budget while maintaining competitive performance metrics.

Algorithmic Contributions

The authors frame their approach within the context of differential privacy, where the goal is to ensure that the participation of any single individual in the dataset does not significantly affect the outcome of the model. The key contributions are as follows:

  1. Enhanced Estimation of Privacy Loss: The authors track detailed information (higher moments) of the privacy loss, leading to tighter estimates of the overall privacy loss compared to standard methods.
  2. Improved Computational Efficiency: They introduce new techniques to enhance the efficiency of differentially private training. These include efficient algorithms for computing gradients for individual training examples, subdividing tasks into smaller batches to reduce memory footprint, and utilizing differentially private principal projection at the input layer.
  3. Integration with TensorFlow: Leveraging the TensorFlow framework, they implement their approach and evaluate it on standard benchmarks like MNIST and CIFAR-10. Their experiments demonstrate that privacy-preserving deep learning can be achieved at a manageable cost.

Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)

A cornerstone of this research is a differentially private variant of the SGD algorithm. Here, gradients are computed for random subsets of data, clipped to a maximum norm to constrain sensitivity, and perturbed by Gaussian noise to ensure privacy. This process guarantees that each parameter update is differentially private, and the overall privacy cost is tracked using a "moments accountant."

Moments Accountant

The moments accountant provides a nuanced method for tracking the cumulative privacy loss over many iterations of the SGD. It is shown to be more accurate than the traditional strong composition theorem, especially for complex models with many parameters and long training times. Theoretical insights indicate that the moments accountant can achieve much tighter bounds on privacy loss, significantly enhancing the efficiency and utility of differentially private training.

Experimental Results

The authors present comprehensive experimental results on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets, demonstrating the practical viability of their approach. Key findings include:

  • For MNIST, with a single hidden layer network and a PCA projection layer, they achieve 97% accuracy under (8, 10-5)-differential privacy.
  • For CIFAR-10, using pre-trained convolutional layers, they obtain 73% accuracy under (8, 10-5)-differential privacy.

Their results confirm that differentially private training can maintain high accuracy while offering strong privacy guarantees.

Hyperparameter Tuning

Recognizing the critical role of hyperparameter tuning, the authors propose methods to balance privacy, accuracy, and training efficiency. They suggest strategies for setting the learning rate, lot size, noise scale, and clipping norms. Utilizing theoretical bounds and empirical observations, they provide guidelines for effective hyperparameter selection in privacy-preserving training regimes.

Implications and Future Work

This research has both theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, it advances the state-of-the-art in differentially private optimization for deep learning. Practically, it demonstrates that privacy-preserving deep learning is feasible without sacrificing model performance significantly. Looking forward, the authors suggest several avenues for future exploration, including extending their techniques to other model architectures and larger datasets, and improving the accuracy further.

Conclusion

Abadi et al.'s work on "Deep Learning with Differential Privacy" represents a significant step toward integrating robust privacy guarantees into the training of complex machine learning models. Through rigorous theoretical contributions and comprehensive empirical evaluations, the paper outlines a feasible path forward for privacy-preserving AI, potentially impacting a wide range of applications where data privacy is paramount. The inclusion of the moments accountant as a methodological innovation particularly stands out, providing a powerful tool for the privacy analysis of composite mechanisms.

In summary, the paper offers a compelling blend of theoretical insight, algorithmic innovation, and empirical validation, contributing to the broader goal of building machine learning systems that respect and preserve user privacy.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Martín Abadi (14 papers)
  2. Andy Chu (3 papers)
  3. Ian Goodfellow (54 papers)
  4. H. Brendan McMahan (49 papers)
  5. Ilya Mironov (23 papers)
  6. Kunal Talwar (83 papers)
  7. Li Zhang (693 papers)
Citations (5,512)