Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Learning Distributed Representations of Sentences from Unlabelled Data (1602.03483v1)

Published 10 Feb 2016 in cs.CL and cs.LG

Abstract: Unsupervised methods for learning distributed representations of words are ubiquitous in today's NLP research, but far less is known about the best ways to learn distributed phrase or sentence representations from unlabelled data. This paper is a systematic comparison of models that learn such representations. We find that the optimal approach depends critically on the intended application. Deeper, more complex models are preferable for representations to be used in supervised systems, but shallow log-linear models work best for building representation spaces that can be decoded with simple spatial distance metrics. We also propose two new unsupervised representation-learning objectives designed to optimise the trade-off between training time, domain portability and performance.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Felix Hill (52 papers)
  2. Kyunghyun Cho (292 papers)
  3. Anna Korhonen (90 papers)
Citations (559)

Summary

Learning Distributed Representations of Sentences from Unlabelled Data

The pursuit of efficient methods to learn distributed representations of sentences has become paramount in NLP. This paper by Hill, Cho, and Korhonen systematically evaluates and compares various models that derive these representations from unlabelled data, offering insights into the effectiveness of different approaches for specific end-use scenarios.

Overview of Methods

Recognizing the ubiquity of unsupervised methods for word-level representations, the authors explore sentence-level representations, a relatively less charted territory. They approach this exploration by examining a range of models, from deep, more intricate architectures to simpler log-linear models. Specifically, the paper introduces two novel objectives: Sequential Denoising Autoencoders (SDAEs) and FastSent. These methods aim to balance the trade-offs among training time, domain adaptability, and performance.

Key Findings

The research findings indicate that the choice of model is heavily dependent on the intended application of the representation. For supervised tasks, such as sentiment classification or paraphrase detection, deeper models like SkipThought vectors frequently outperform others, demonstrating their superior capacity to capture intricate features. For example, the SkipThought model achieved high efficacy in supervised benchmarks across tasks such as sentiment analysis and question classification.

Conversely, log-linear models like FastSent demonstrate notable success in unsupervised scenarios. On the SICK sentence relatedness task—a benchmark for semantic similarity—FastSent outperformed even advanced models, validating its simplicity and effectiveness in capturing semantic interdependencies without requiring substantial computational resources.

Novel Contributions

The introduction of the SDAE model represents a meaningful enhancement in learning robust sentence representations. The denoising autoencoder approach effectively incorporates noise, enhancing model robustness by training on syntactically varied inputs. The FastSent model, characterized by its computational efficiency and simplicity, excels in scenarios demanding rapid encoding, delivering competitive performance in unsupervised sentence similarity tasks.

Implications and Future Directions

This research highlights the significance of aligning model complexity with task requirements. For computationally constrained settings or unsupervised tasks, simpler models like FastSent may provide a pragmatic alternative without significant compromises in performance. The dual strengths of FastSent and SDAE suggest promising potential for further exploration in sentence representation learning.

Future directions could expand on integrating these representational techniques into larger AI systems, potentially enhancing language understanding and common-sense reasoning. Additionally, exploring hybrid approaches that combine strengths from both deep and shallow models could yield innovative solutions, facilitating more nuanced and context-aware language systems.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of sentence representation models, shedding light on the suitability of different models for varied applications. By presenting a nuanced understanding of model performance in relation to task specificity, the authors offer valuable guidance to the NLP research community for optimizing sentence representation learning strategies.