Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Tight Running Time Lower Bounds for Vertex Deletion Problems (1511.05449v2)

Published 17 Nov 2015 in cs.DS, cs.CC, and cs.DM

Abstract: For a graph class $\Pi$, the $\Pi$-Vertex Deletion problem has as input an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ and an integer $k$ and asks whether there is a set of at most $k$ vertices that can be deleted from $G$ such that the resulting graph is a member of $\Pi$. By a classic result of Lewis and Yannakakis [J. Comput. Syst. Sci. '80], $\Pi$-Vertex Deletion is NP-hard for all hereditary properties $\Pi$. We adapt the original NP-hardness construction to show that under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) tight complexity results can be obtained. We show that $\Pi$-Vertex Deletion does not admit a $2{o(n)}$-time algorithm where $n$ is the number of vertices in $G$. We also obtain a dichotomy for running time bounds that include the number $m$ of edges in the input graph: On the one hand, if $\Pi$ contains all independent sets, then there is no $2{o(n+m)}$-time algorithm for $\Pi$-Vertex Deletion. On the other hand, if there is a fixed independent set that is not contained in $\Pi$ and containment in $\Pi$ can determined in $2{O(n)}$ time or $2{o(m)}$ time, then $\Pi$-Vertex Deletion can be solved in $2{O(\sqrt{m})}+O(n)$ or $2{o({m})}+O(n)$ time, respectively. We also consider restrictions on the domain of the input graph $G$. For example, we obtain that $\Pi$-Vertex Deletion cannot be solved in $2{o(\sqrt{n})}$ time if $G$ is planar and $\Pi$ is hereditary and contains and excludes infinitely many planar graphs. Finally, we provide similar results for the problem variant where the deleted vertex set has to induce a connected graph.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (1)
  1. Christian Komusiewicz (46 papers)
Citations (11)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.