Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Representation Benefits of Deep Feedforward Networks (1509.08101v2)

Published 27 Sep 2015 in cs.LG and cs.NE

Abstract: This note provides a family of classification problems, indexed by a positive integer $k$, where all shallow networks with fewer than exponentially (in $k$) many nodes exhibit error at least $1/6$, whereas a deep network with 2 nodes in each of $2k$ layers achieves zero error, as does a recurrent network with 3 distinct nodes iterated $k$ times. The proof is elementary, and the networks are standard feedforward networks with ReLU (Rectified Linear Unit) nonlinearities.

Citations (236)

Summary

  • The paper shows that deep feedforward networks with just two nodes per layer over 2k layers can achieve zero error on particular classification problems.
  • The methodology rigorously contrasts the performance of deep and shallow architectures, revealing that shallow networks require exponentially more nodes to reach below a 1/6 error rate.
  • The findings imply that increasing network depth can enhance representational capacity more efficiently than merely expanding network width, guiding practical design choices.

Representation Benefits of Deep Feedforward Networks

The paper "Representation Benefits of Deep Feedforward Networks" by Matus Telgarsky presents a noteworthy exploration into the expressive power of deep feedforward neural networks, specifically when employing ReLU nonlinearities. The work provides a family of classification problems demonstrating that deep networks exhibit significant advantages over shallow counterparts in specific scenarios. This work contributes to the understanding of neural network architecture, focusing on the representational capacity of depth in feedforward structures.

Summary of Main Findings

The central claim of the paper is the identification of a family of classification problems, parameterized by an integer kk, where shallow networks with fewer than exponentially many nodes (in terms of kk) maintain a minimum error rate of $1/6$. In contrast, a deep network with merely two nodes per layer over $2k$ layers achieves zero error. Furthermore, a recurrent network with three distinct nodes iterated kk times also incurs no error. This stark contrast showcases the enhanced representational power endowed by deeper architectures.

The work leverages an elementary yet rigorous proof to validate these claims. The networks examined are standard feedforward architectures integrated with ReLU activations, making the results broadly applicable within the field of contemporary machine learning models.

Theoretical Implications

The paper extends the dialogue on neural network expressive power, specifically emphasizing the impact of depth. It challenges the classic universal approximation theorems, which affirm that shallow networks can approximate any function arbitrarily well, by demonstrating that depth can significantly reduce the required number of network parameters for certain classes of problems. This aligns with insights from circuit complexity, where deeper circuits have been shown to efficiently solve tasks that shallow circuits struggle with.

These findings have practical implications for the design of neural networks, suggesting that, in scenarios where capacity or resources are constrained, increasing the depth of a network could prove more beneficial than merely expanding its width. The results further imply that deep architectures may inherently possess a form of structural optimization for certain classes of functions, reducing the burden of parameter tuning and enabling more efficient learning.

Future Prospects

This investigation prompts several avenues for future research in the architecture of neural networks. One potential direction is to bridge these theoretical insights with empirical results, investigating whether similar benefits of depth can be observed in real-world tasks under different constraints and settings. Additionally, the role of various nonlinearities, aside from ReLU, in the context of network depth deserves exploration, to understand whether the observed phenomena extend across diverse activation functions.

Moreover, the stark difference in error rates between deep and shallow networks invites further inquiry into the mechanisms of such representational benefits—possibly through an analysis of the function space carved by deep networks versus shallow ones. Understanding the dynamics of training deep networks, especially in terms of optimization landscapes and convergence properties, could enhance the theoretical value offered by this paper.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the paper by Matus Telgarsky provides substantial contributions to the understanding of neural network architecture, specifically highlighting the benefits of depth in feedforward networks with ReLU activations. The findings underscore the importance of architectural choices in model design and suggest that, in certain problem classes, depth is a critical factor for achieving optimal performance. This work lays groundwork not only for theoretical exploration but also potentially influences practical, efficient design in modern neural network applications.