Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Adaptive Automation: Leveraging Machine Learning to Support Uninterrupted Automated Testing of Software Applications (1508.00671v1)

Published 4 Aug 2015 in cs.SE

Abstract: Checking software application suitability using automated software tools has become a vital element for most organisations irrespective of whether they produce in-house software or simply customise off-the-shelf software applications for internal use. As software solutions become ever more complex, the industry becomes increasingly dependent on software automation tools, yet the brittle nature of the available software automation tools limits their effectiveness. Companies invest significantly in obtaining and implementing automation software but most of the tools fail to deliver when the cost of maintaining an effective automation test suite exceeds the cost and time that would have otherwise been spent on manual testing. A failing in the current generation of software automation tools is they do not adapt to unexpected modifications and obstructions without frequent (and time expensive) manual interference. Such issues are commonly acknowledged amongst industry practitioners, yet none of the current generation of tools have leveraged the advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence to address these problems. This paper proposes a framework solution that utilises machine learning concepts, namely fuzzy matching and error recovery. The suggested solution applies adaptive techniques to recover from unexpected obstructions that would otherwise have prevented the script from proceeding. Recovery details are presented to the user in a report which can be analysed to determine if the recovery procedure was acceptable and the framework will adapt future runs based on the decisions of the user. Using this framework, a practitioner can run the automated suits without human intervention while minimising the risk of schedule delays.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Rajesh Mathur (1 paper)
  2. Scott Miles (5 papers)
  3. Miao Du (15 papers)
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.