Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Generalization in Adaptive Data Analysis and Holdout Reuse (1506.02629v2)

Published 8 Jun 2015 in cs.LG and cs.DS

Abstract: Overfitting is the bane of data analysts, even when data are plentiful. Formal approaches to understanding this problem focus on statistical inference and generalization of individual analysis procedures. Yet the practice of data analysis is an inherently interactive and adaptive process: new analyses and hypotheses are proposed after seeing the results of previous ones, parameters are tuned on the basis of obtained results, and datasets are shared and reused. An investigation of this gap has recently been initiated by the authors in (Dwork et al., 2014), where we focused on the problem of estimating expectations of adaptively chosen functions. In this paper, we give a simple and practical method for reusing a holdout (or testing) set to validate the accuracy of hypotheses produced by a learning algorithm operating on a training set. Reusing a holdout set adaptively multiple times can easily lead to overfitting to the holdout set itself. We give an algorithm that enables the validation of a large number of adaptively chosen hypotheses, while provably avoiding overfitting. We illustrate the advantages of our algorithm over the standard use of the holdout set via a simple synthetic experiment. We also formalize and address the general problem of data reuse in adaptive data analysis. We show how the differential-privacy based approach given in (Dwork et al., 2014) is applicable much more broadly to adaptive data analysis. We then show that a simple approach based on description length can also be used to give guarantees of statistical validity in adaptive settings. Finally, we demonstrate that these incomparable approaches can be unified via the notion of approximate max-information that we introduce.

Citations (224)

Summary

  • The paper presents a novel reusable holdout framework that mitigates overfitting in adaptive data analysis.
  • It extends differential privacy techniques to ensure statistically valid results in iterative, adaptive measurements.
  • It introduces description length guarantees and approximate max-information to unify and control information leakage during analysis.

Generalization in Adaptive Data Analysis and Holdout Reuse

The paper "Generalization in Adaptive Data Analysis and Holdout Reuse" addresses critical issues in data analysis, such as overfitting, which persist even with abundant data. The authors emphasize the adaptive and interactive nature of data analysis, where iterative hypotheses are formed based on prior experiments and their outcomes. This paper builds on prior work by the same authors, focusing on estimating expectations of adaptively chosen functions.

Key Concepts and Contributions

  1. Adaptive Data Analysis: The paper acknowledges that data analysis is inherently interactive, highlighting that analyses often adapt based on prior outcomes, leading to potential overfitting. Traditional approaches of validating analyses on freshly acquired holdout datasets do not cater to the adaptive setting, where datasets are repeatedly reused.
  2. Reusable Holdout Set: The authors present a novel method for validating hypotheses generated by learning algorithms using a holdout set multiple times without introducing significant overfitting. The algorithm can handle a large number of adaptive queries while ensuring statistical validity. This approach enables analysts to draw more accurate and general conclusions by reducing dependence on static assumptions.
  3. Differential Privacy Approach: The paper extends the utility of differential privacy into adaptive settings, showcasing its ability to offer broad generalization guarantees beyond i.i.d. datasets. The results extend upon previous connections established between differential privacy and generalization, emphasizing its robustness in adaptive analysis.
  4. Description Length-based Guarantees: The authors introduce an alternative approach using description length to guarantee generalization in adaptive data reuse. By limiting the complexity (in bits) of the results produced by the analysis, they ensure that the overfitting potential remains minimal.
  5. Approximate Max-Information: Introducing the concept of approximate max-information, the paper unifies differential privacy and description length approaches under this new theoretical framework. This concept provides an overarching perspective on managing information revealed during data analysis, ensuring robust generalization across adaptive compositions.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

  • Practical Implications:

The methodologies proposed, especially the reusable holdout set, will significantly improve the efficiency of data validation processes in practical machine learning tasks. Analysts can circumvent the exhaustive need for new data, optimizing existing resources effectively, making this particularly beneficial in resource-constrained scenarios such as drug discovery or climate modeling.

  • Theoretical Implications:

The introduction of approximate max-information offers a profound theoretical tool for managing adaptivity in data analysis. It opens up pathways for future theoretical developments in deriving generalization bounds and constructing robust adaptive learning algorithms.

Future Directions

The framework provided by the authors sets the stage for subsequent research into refining adaptive learning techniques that cohesively integrate differential privacy and information theoretic approaches. Future work could explore extending these guarantees to broader classes of learning algorithms and more complex adaptive settings, providing more comprehensive models that address diverse real-world data challenges.

In summary, this paper offers significant contributions to understanding and controlling overfitting in adaptive data analysis, providing both practical algorithms and theoretical insights that are likely to shape future developments in machine learning and statistical data analysis. The integration of differential privacy and description length into a unified framework for generalization in adaptive settings represents a powerful step forward in the discipline.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com