Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Joint Planck and WMAP Assessment of Low CMB Multipoles (1501.02647v2)

Published 12 Jan 2015 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: The remarkable progress in cosmic microwave background (CMB) studies over past decade has led to the era of precision cosmology in striking agreement with the $\Lambda$CDM model. However, the lack of power in the CMB temperature anisotropies at large angular scales (low-$\ell$), as has been confirmed by the recent Planck data also (up to $\ell=40$), although statistically not very strong (less than $3\sigma$), is still an open problem. One can avoid to seek an explanation for this problem by attributing the lack of power to cosmic variance orcan look for explanations i.e., different inflationary potentials or initial conditions for infl ation to begin with, non-trivial topology, ISW effect etc. Features in the primordial power spectrum (PPS) motivated by the early universe physics has been the most common solution to address this problem. In the present work we also follow this approach and consider a set of PPS which have features and constrain the parameters of those using WMAP 9 year and Planck data employing Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis. The prominent feature of all the models of PPS that we consider is an infra-red cut off which leads to suppression of power at large angular scales. We consider models of PPS with maximum three extra parameters and use Akaike information criterion ($AIC$) and Bayesian information criterion ($BIC$) of model and Bayesian information criterion ($BIC$) of model selection to compare the models. For most models, we find good constraints for the cut off scale $k_c$, however, for other parameters our constraints are not that good. We find that sharp cut off model gives best likelihood value for the WMAP 9 year data, but is as good as power law model according to $AIC$. For the joint WMAP 9+Planck data set, Starobinsky model is slightly preferred by $AIC$ which is also able to produce CMB power suppression up to $\ell\leq30$ to some extent.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.