Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep Captioning with Multimodal Recurrent Neural Networks (m-RNN) (1412.6632v5)

Published 20 Dec 2014 in cs.CV, cs.CL, and cs.LG
Deep Captioning with Multimodal Recurrent Neural Networks (m-RNN)

Abstract: In this paper, we present a multimodal Recurrent Neural Network (m-RNN) model for generating novel image captions. It directly models the probability distribution of generating a word given previous words and an image. Image captions are generated by sampling from this distribution. The model consists of two sub-networks: a deep recurrent neural network for sentences and a deep convolutional network for images. These two sub-networks interact with each other in a multimodal layer to form the whole m-RNN model. The effectiveness of our model is validated on four benchmark datasets (IAPR TC-12, Flickr 8K, Flickr 30K and MS COCO). Our model outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. In addition, we apply the m-RNN model to retrieval tasks for retrieving images or sentences, and achieves significant performance improvement over the state-of-the-art methods which directly optimize the ranking objective function for retrieval. The project page of this work is: www.stat.ucla.edu/~junhua.mao/m-RNN.html .

Deep Captioning with Multimodal Recurrent Neural Networks (m-RNN): A Synthesis

The paper "Deep Captioning with Multimodal Recurrent Neural Networks (m-RNN)" by Junhua Mao et al. provides a robust exploration of generating image captions using a cohesive architecture that integrates visual and linguistic information. The m-RNN model introduces a framework which demonstrates superior performance across several benchmarks for both generative and retrieval tasks, setting a high standard in the domain of vision-language integration.

Model Architecture

At the core of the paper is the m-RNN model, which strategically combines a deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for image representation with a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) for sequential LLMing. These two subnetworks interface through a multimodal layer, allowing for the efficient blending of visual and linguistic features.

Key components include:

  • Word Embedding System: Two sequential word embedding layers that encode words into dense vectors, capturing syntactic and semantic nuances.
  • Recurrent Layer: A 256-dimensional recurrent layer designed to maintain temporal dependencies in linguistic data without escalating computational demands.
  • Multimodal Layer: This layer merges representations from the word embedding layers, the recurrent layer, and the CNN, culminating in a softmax layer to generate the probability distribution of the next word in the sequence.

Training and Evaluation

The model is trained using a log-likelihood cost function, optimizing the probability of generating target sentences conditioned on corresponding images. This is achieved by backpropagating the cost function's gradient through both the visual and language components of the network, hence fine-tuning both representations in a unified manner.

The efficacy of the m-RNN model was validated across four key benchmark datasets: IAPR TC-12, Flickr 8K, Flickr 30K, and MS COCO. The performance metrics included BLEU scores and recall rates (R@K) for both sentence generation and retrieval tasks. Notably, the model outperformed prior state-of-the-art methods significantly, particularly in terms of BLEU scores, which emphasize generating coherent and contextually appropriate sentences.

Results

Sentence Generation

  • On IAPR TC-12, the m-RNN model achieved higher BLEU scores compared to models such as MLBLB-AlexNet and MLBLF-AlexNet.
  • Evaluation on Flickr8K dataset demonstrated that m-RNN surpasses competing approaches like Deep Fragment Embedding (DeepFE) and Structured Deep Embedding (SDE) using comparable image features.

Retrieval Tasks

  • In sentence retrieval tasks (Image to Text) and image retrieval tasks (Text to Image) across multiple datasets, m-RNN exhibited superior rank-based retrieval performance, notably improving R@K scores and achieving lower median ranks.
  • On MS COCO, m-RNN with VggNet representations achieved the highest results in both sentence and image retrieval tasks, setting a new benchmark.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The paper makes several salient contributions:

  1. Enhanced Integration of Visual and Linguistic Data: By directly incorporating image features into the multimodal layer rather than diluting them across recurrent layers, the m-RNN maximizes the synergy between vision and language.
  2. Efficiency in Representation Learning: The two-layer word embedding system proves more effective than simplistic one-layer embeddings, leading to richer semantic representations and improved LLMing.

Future Prospects

The m-RNN framework opens several avenues for future research:

  • End-to-End Learning with Larger Datasets: With the expansion of datasets like the full MS COCO, there exists the potential to leverage end-to-end training of both vision and language components, potentially refining visual feature extraction.
  • Incorporation of Advanced Image Representations: Integration of object detection systems such as RCNN could enhance the model's ability to parse complex scenes.
  • Exploring Alternative RNN Architectures: Adoption of architectures like LSTM or GRU could mitigate issues like the exploding gradient problem and further enhance performance.

In conclusion, the m-RNN model represents a significant advancement in the field of image captioning, achieving notable improvements in both generative and retrieval metrics across several benchmark datasets. The findings and methods proposed in this paper lay a robust foundation for future explorations into multimodal learning, bridging the domains of computer vision and natural language processing more seamlessly.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Junhua Mao (11 papers)
  2. Wei Xu (535 papers)
  3. Yi Yang (855 papers)
  4. Jiang Wang (50 papers)
  5. Zhiheng Huang (33 papers)
  6. Alan Yuille (294 papers)
Citations (1,220)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

GitHub