Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Comparing A^1-h-cobordism and A^1-weak equivalence (1410.3038v1)

Published 12 Oct 2014 in math.AG, math.AT, and math.KT

Abstract: We study the problem of classifying projectivizations of rank-two vector bundles over ${\mathbb P}2$ up to various notions of equivalence that arise naturally in ${\mathbb A}1$-homotopy theory, namely ${\mathbb A}1$-weak equivalence and ${\mathbb A}1$-$h$-cobordism. First, we classify such varieties up to ${\mathbb A}1$-weak equivalence: over algebraically closed fields having characteristic unequal to two the classification can be given in terms of characteristic classes of the underlying vector bundle. When the base field is ${\mathbb C}$, this classification result can be compared to a corresponding topological result and we find that the algebraic and topological homotopy classifications agree. Second, we study the problem of classifying such varieties up to ${\mathbb A}1$-$h$-cobordism using techniques of deformation theory. To this end, we establish a deformation rigidity result for ${\mathbb P}1$-bundles over ${\mathbb P}2$ which links ${\mathbb A}1$-$h$-cobordisms to deformations of the underlying vector bundles. Using results from the deformation theory of vector bundles we show that if $X$ is a ${\mathbb P}1$-bundle over ${\mathbb P}2$ and $Y$ is the projectivization of a direct sum of line bundles on ${\mathbb P}2$, then if $X$ is ${\mathbb A}1$-weakly equivalent to $Y$, $X$ is also ${\mathbb A}1$-$h$-cobordant to $Y$. Finally, we discuss some subtleties inherent in the definition of ${\mathbb A}1$-$h$-cobordism. We show, for instance, that direct ${\mathbb A}1$-$h$-cobordism fails to be an equivalence relation.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.