Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Oversampling Increases the Pre-Log of Noncoherent Rayleigh Fading Channels (1405.0370v2)

Published 2 May 2014 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: We analyze the capacity of a continuous-time, time-selective, Rayleigh block-fading channel in the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regime. The fading process is assumed stationary within each block and to change independently from block to block; furthermore, its realizations are not known a priori to the transmitter and the receiver (noncoherent setting). A common approach to analyzing the capacity of this channel is to assume that the receiver performs matched filtering followed by sampling at symbol rate (symbol matched filtering). This yields a discrete-time channel in which each transmitted symbol corresponds to one output sample. Liang & Veeravalli (2004) showed that the capacity of this discrete-time channel grows logarithmically with the SNR, with a capacity pre-log equal to $1-{Q}/{N}$. Here, $N$ is the number of symbols transmitted within one fading block, and $Q$ is the rank of the covariance matrix of the discrete-time channel gains within each fading block. In this paper, we show that symbol matched filtering is not a capacity-achieving strategy for the underlying continuous-time channel. Specifically, we analyze the capacity pre-log of the discrete-time channel obtained by oversampling the continuous-time channel output, i.e., by sampling it faster than at symbol rate. We prove that by oversampling by a factor two one gets a capacity pre-log that is at least as large as $1-1/N$. Since the capacity pre-log corresponding to symbol-rate sampling is $1-Q/N$, our result implies indeed that symbol matched filtering is not capacity achieving at high SNR.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Meik Dörpinghaus (16 papers)
  2. Günther Koliander (24 papers)
  3. Giuseppe Durisi (119 papers)
  4. Erwin Riegler (27 papers)
  5. Heinrich Meyr (9 papers)
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.