Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

ParamILS: An Automatic Algorithm Configuration Framework (1401.3492v1)

Published 15 Jan 2014 in cs.AI

Abstract: The identification of performance-optimizing parameter settings is an important part of the development and application of algorithms. We describe an automatic framework for this algorithm configuration problem. More formally, we provide methods for optimizing a target algorithm's performance on a given class of problem instances by varying a set of ordinal and/or categorical parameters. We review a family of local-search-based algorithm configuration procedures and present novel techniques for accelerating them by adaptively limiting the time spent for evaluating individual configurations. We describe the results of a comprehensive experimental evaluation of our methods, based on the configuration of prominent complete and incomplete algorithms for SAT. We also present what is, to our knowledge, the first published work on automatically configuring the CPLEX mixed integer programming solver. All the algorithms we considered had default parameter settings that were manually identified with considerable effort. Nevertheless, using our automated algorithm configuration procedures, we achieved substantial and consistent performance improvements.

Citations (1,044)

Summary

  • The paper formalizes the algorithm configuration problem and introduces ParamILS, highlighting its capability to optimize parameter settings using iterative local search.
  • It details the use of adaptive capping techniques to efficiently terminate poor-performing configurations, reducing computational cost.
  • Empirical results show significant speedup factors, including over 500-fold improvement for the SPEAR solver in software verification tasks.

An Insightful Overview of "ParamILS: An Automatic Algorithm Configuration Framework"

The paper "ParamILS: An Automatic Algorithm Configuration Framework" by Frank Hutter, Holger H. Hoos, Kevin Leyton-Brown, and Thomas Stutzle focuses on the development of an automatic framework for optimizing the performance of algorithms by systematically varying their parameters. The framework, named ParamILS, leverages local search techniques and introduces novel methods for adaptive evaluation to streamline the optimization process.

Core Contributions

  1. Formalization of the Algorithm Configuration Problem: The authors formalize the task of algorithm configuration, defining it as finding the optimal parameter settings that minimize a performance measure over a given set of problem instances. This task is framed as a stochastic optimization problem, acknowledging the impact of randomization in heuristic algorithms.
  2. Introduction of ParamILS: The ParamILS framework is based on Iterated Local Search (ILS) in the parameter configuration space. It uses stochastic local search strategies to explore the space of possible parameter settings efficiently. The framework leverages an initial random sampling of configurations, followed by iterative improvement with mechanisms for escaping local optima.
  3. Adaptive Capping Techniques: The paper introduces adaptive techniques for imposing runtime caps during the evaluation of parameter configurations. These techniques, including trajectory-preserving and aggressive capping, significantly reduce the computational cost by terminating evaluations of poor-performing configurations early. This adaptive capping is a crucial enhancement that accelerates the optimization process without altering the search trajectory fundamentally.
  4. Empirical Validation: The efficacy of ParamILS is validated through extensive empirical evaluations on various configuration scenarios involving SAT solvers (SAPS and SPEAR) and the CPLEX mixed integer programming solver. These experiments demonstrate consistent and substantial improvements in performance over manually-tuned default parameter settings.

Performance and Results

The paper reports strong numerical results across different benchmarks. For instance, the application of ParamILS to SAPS and SPEAR solvers yielded speedup factors of up to several orders of magnitude compared to default configurations. The most notable improvement was observed in configuring SPEAR for software verification instances, achieving a speedup factor of over 500. Additionally, ParamILS was applied to the highly complex CPLEX solver, where significant performance gains were obtained for diverse benchmark sets.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

Practical Implications:

  • Efficiency Gains: Automated configuration can significantly reduce the time and effort required for manual tuning, leading to quicker deployment and better performance of heuristic algorithms in practice.
  • Broad Applicability: ParamILS has demonstrated its effectiveness across various domains, indicating its general applicability to a wide range of heuristic search problems.
  • Scalability: The adaptive capping techniques ensure that even computationally expensive algorithms can benefit from automated configuration without prohibitively high computational costs.

Theoretical Implications:

  • Stochastic Optimization: The work provides a robust approach to handling stochastic optimization problems where the objective function evaluation is inherently noisy and costly.
  • Local Search Techniques: The successful application of ILS and adaptive capping showcases the potential of local search methods in navigating complex, high-dimensional parameter spaces.
  • Algorithm Design: ParamILS facilitates a semi-automatic design of heuristic algorithms by exploring large configuration spaces that are infeasible for manual examination.

Speculation on Future Developments in AI

Future research can expand upon the foundations laid by ParamILS by integrating machine learning techniques to predict good parameter configurations directly. Meta-learning approaches could also be explored to generalize learned configurations across similar algorithmic settings and instance distributions efficiently. Moreover, advancements in parallel and distributed computing could further enhance the scalability and reduce the overall wall-clock time of the configuration process.

Another promising direction involves the automated design of algorithms from modular components, as early work with SATenstein indicates. Such approaches could lead to breakthroughs in the development of highly specialized algorithms tailored to specific classes of computational problems.

In conclusion, the ParamILS framework represents a significant step forward in the automation of algorithm configuration, offering both substantive performance gains and broad applicability. Its methodological innovations and empirical successes make it a valuable tool in the algorithm developer's arsenal, driving efficiency and performance across a myriad of application domains.