Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Predictive Monitoring of Business Processes (1312.4874v2)

Published 17 Dec 2013 in cs.SE

Abstract: Modern information systems that support complex business processes generally maintain significant amounts of process execution data, particularly records of events corresponding to the execution of activities (event logs). In this paper, we present an approach to analyze such event logs in order to predictively monitor business goals during business process execution. At any point during an execution of a process, the user can define business goals in the form of linear temporal logic rules. When an activity is being executed, the framework identifies input data values that are more (or less) likely to lead to the achievement of each business goal. Unlike reactive compliance monitoring approaches that detect violations only after they have occurred, our predictive monitoring approach provides early advice so that users can steer ongoing process executions towards the achievement of business goals. In other words, violations are predicted (and potentially prevented) rather than merely detected. The approach has been implemented in the ProM process mining toolset and validated on a real-life log pertaining to the treatment of cancer patients in a large hospital.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Fabrizio Maria Maggi (30 papers)
  2. Chiara Di Francescomarino (23 papers)
  3. Marlon Dumas (61 papers)
  4. Chiara Ghidini (28 papers)
Citations (276)

Summary

Predictive Monitoring of Business Processes

The paper "Predictive Monitoring of Business Processes" offers a sophisticated framework for predictive monitoring within business process management using historical event logs. Authored by Fabrizio Maria Maggi, Chiara Di Francescomarino, Marlon Dumas, and Chiara Ghidini, this research addresses the limitations of reactive compliance monitoring systems which only detect violations after they occur. Instead, the proposed framework is designed to anticipate possible deviations from business goals and to offer recommendations to steer process executions accordingly.

Central to this framework is the integration of control-flow and data perspective predictions, a significant advancement from preceding models which mostly concentrated on either perspective in isolation. Compliance monitoring traditionally involves ensuring that business process executions adhere to various business constraints such as internal policies and legal regulations. While conventional approaches in this domain are effective in identifying what has gone wrong, the ability to predict potential deviations offers a powerful, proactive tool for process management.

Framework Design and Implementation

The framework consists of two principal components: the Trace Processor and the Predictor. Historical log traces are first filtered through the Trace Processor which uses trace prefix similarity to produce a training set. This training set is subsequently employed by the Predictor to generate a decision tree through decision tree learning methods, specifically utilizing the C4.5 algorithm via the WeKa J48 implementation. This decision tree guides both prediction and recommendation, estimating the likelihood of achieving specified business goals set using Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) rules. The efficacy of the framework is validated using a real-life log related to cancer treatment processes, pointing to its practical applicability.

Evaluation and Findings

The authors conducted a rigorous evaluation using the BPI challenge 2011 dataset, revealing that while the framework delivers robust predictions generally, certain formulas with sparse positive instances (e.g., φ3\varphi_3) result in overfitting. The paper highlighted how prediction reliability is influenced by parameters such as trace similarity thresholds and class support levels. For instance, filtering predictions with class support above the median significantly enhanced predictive accuracy.

Implications and Future Work

Practically, this framework holds the potential to optimize decision-making in various domains by providing process participants with insights into the effects of their input decisions. Theoretically, it extends the conversation on integrating multiple dimensions of business data for more holistic process insights. Future research could explore varied similarity measures to refine the trace filtering process and alternative classification techniques like random forests to handle enriched datasets effectively.

The potential impact on AI lies in the ability to anticipate outcomes in partially known environments based on patterns from past data. This aligns with the broader AI trend of leveraging machine learning models to not just react to data but pre-emptively influence process outcomes for increased efficiency and compliance.

The robust decision-making support provided by this predictive framework, when fully realized, could become a cornerstone of intelligent business process management systems, offering dynamic, context-aware insights that adapt to the process landscape in real time.