Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Hardness Amplification and the Approximate Degree of Constant-Depth Circuits (1311.1616v4)

Published 7 Nov 2013 in cs.CC

Abstract: We establish a generic form of hardness amplification for the approximability of constant-depth Boolean circuits by polynomials. Specifically, we show that if a Boolean circuit cannot be pointwise approximated by low-degree polynomials to within constant error in a certain one-sided sense, then an OR of disjoint copies of that circuit cannot be pointwise approximated even with very high error. As our main application, we show that for every sequence of degrees $d(n)$, there is an explicit depth-three circuit $F: {-1,1}n \to {-1,1}$ of polynomial-size such that any degree-$d$ polynomial cannot pointwise approximate $F$ to error better than $1-\exp\left(-\tilde{\Omega}(nd{-3/2})\right)$. As a consequence of our main result, we obtain an $\exp\left(-\tilde{\Omega}(n{2/5})\right)$ upper bound on the the discrepancy of a function in AC$0$, and an $\exp\left(\tilde{\Omega}(n{2/5})\right)$ lower bound on the threshold weight of AC$0$, improving over the previous best results of $\exp\left(-\Omega(n{1/3})\right)$ and $\exp\left(\Omega(n{1/3})\right)$ respectively. Our techniques also yield a new lower bound of $\Omega\left(n{1/2}/\log{(d-2)/2}(n)\right)$ on the approximate degree of the AND-OR tree of depth $d$, which is tight up to polylogarithmic factors for any constant $d$, as well as new bounds for read-once DNF formulas. In turn, these results imply new lower bounds on the communication and circuit complexity of these classes, and demonstrate strong limitations on existing PAC learning algorithms.

Citations (35)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.