Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Convergence Rates of Distributed Nesterov-like Gradient Methods on Random Networks (1308.0916v1)

Published 5 Aug 2013 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: We consider distributed optimization in random networks where N nodes cooperatively minimize the sum \sum_{i=1}N f_i(x) of their individual convex costs. Existing literature proposes distributed gradient-like methods that are computationally cheap and resilient to link failures, but have slow convergence rates. In this paper, we propose accelerated distributed gradient methods that: 1) are resilient to link failures; 2) computationally cheap; and 3) improve convergence rates over other gradient methods. We model the network by a sequence of independent, identically distributed random matrices {W(k)} drawn from the set of symmetric, stochastic matrices with positive diagonals. The network is connected on average and the cost functions are convex, differentiable, with Lipschitz continuous and bounded gradients. We design two distributed Nesterov-like gradient methods that modify the D-NG and D-NC methods that we proposed for static networks. We prove their convergence rates in terms of the expected optimality gap at the cost function. Let k and K be the number of per-node gradient evaluations and per-node communications, respectively. Then the modified D-NG achieves rates O(log k/k) and O(\log K/K), and the modified D-NC rates O(1/k2) and O(1/K{2-\xi}), where \xi>0 is arbitrarily small. For comparison, the standard distributed gradient method cannot do better than \Omega(1/k{2/3}) and \Omega(1/K{2/3}), on the same class of cost functions (even for static networks). Simulation examples illustrate our analytical findings.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Dusan Jakovetic (47 papers)
  2. Joao Xavier (16 papers)
  3. Jose M. F. Moura (24 papers)
Citations (50)