Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Optimal Relay Selection for Physical-Layer Security in Cooperative Wireless Networks (1305.0817v1)

Published 3 May 2013 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: In this paper, we explore the physical-layer security in cooperative wireless networks with multiple relays where both amplify-and-forward (AF) and decode-and-forward (DF) protocols are considered. We propose the AF and DF based optimal relay selection (i.e., AFbORS and DFbORS) schemes to improve the wireless security against eavesdropping attack. For the purpose of comparison, we examine the traditional AFbORS and DFbORS schemes, denoted by T-AFbORS and TDFbORS, respectively. We also investigate a so-called multiple relay combining (MRC) framework and present the traditional AF and DF based MRC schemes, called T-AFbMRC and TDFbMRC, where multiple relays participate in forwarding the source signal to destination which then combines its received signals from the multiple relays. We derive closed-form intercept probability expressions of the proposed AFbORS and DFbORS (i.e., P-AFbORS and P-DFbORS) as well as the T-AFbORS, TDFbORS, T-AFbMRC and T-DFbMRC schemes in the presence of eavesdropping attack. We further conduct an asymptotic intercept probability analysis to evaluate the diversity order performance of relay selection schemes and show that no matter which relaying protocol is considered (i.e., AF and DF), the traditional and proposed optimal relay selection approaches both achieve the diversity order M where M represents the number of relays. In addition, numerical results show that for both AF and DF protocols, the intercept probability performance of proposed optimal relay selection is strictly better than that of the traditional relay selection and multiple relay combining methods.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Yulong Zou (43 papers)
  2. Xianbin Wang (124 papers)
  3. Weiming Shen (53 papers)
Citations (531)

Summary

  • The paper proposes optimal relay selection schemes (P-AFbORS and P-DFbORS) for cooperative wireless networks that consider wiretap link channel state information to enhance physical-layer security against eavesdropping.
  • Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed schemes consistently achieve lower intercept probabilities compared to traditional methods and multiple relay combining techniques.
  • This research highlights that incorporating wiretap channel information into the relay selection process is crucial for significantly improving physical-layer security in cooperative communication systems.

Essay on Optimal Relay Selection for Physical-Layer Security in Cooperative Wireless Networks

The research paper, "Optimal Relay Selection for Physical-Layer Security in Cooperative Wireless Networks," authored by Yulong Zou, Xianbin Wang, and Weiming Shen, provides a rigorous examination of relay selection strategies aimed at enhancing physical-layer security against eavesdropping attacks in cooperative wireless networks. The investigation centers on amplify-and-forward (AF) and decode-and-forward (DF) protocols, assessing both traditional and newly proposed optimal relay selection schemes.

Overview and Methodology

The paper addresses the challenge of achieving spatial diversity in environments where implementing multiple antennas is impractical due to limitations in device size and power. This paper focuses on utilizing user cooperation to enhance wireless communication security through optimal relay selection in the presence of eavesdroppers.

The authors explore several relay selection schemes:

  1. Traditional AF and DF Optimal Relay Selection (T-AFbORS and T-DFbORS): These schemes are based solely on the channel state information (CSI) of the main links (source-relay and relay-destination).
  2. Proposed AF and DF Based Optimal Relay Selection (P-AFbORS and P-DFbORS): Consideration is given to the wiretap links' CSI in addition to the main links' CSI, aiming to maximize the secrecy capacity.
  3. Multiple Relay Combining Methods (T-AFbMRC and T-DFbMRC): Multiple relays combine their signals in order to forward to the destination, contrasting with the single-relay strategies.

Results and Insights

The paper's key contribution lies in the derivation of closed-form expressions for intercept probability across different relay selection schemes. The analysis shows:

  • Numerical Results: The proposed schemes (P-AFbORS and P-DFbORS) consistently demonstrated lower intercept probabilities than their traditional counterparts and the multiple relay combining schemes, highlighting their superior performance in securing wireless communications.
  • Diversity Order: Both traditional and proposed schemes achieve a diversity order of M, where M is the number of relays. This indicates that all schemes improve intercept probability as the number of relays increases, underlining the importance of cooperative diversity.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

The research significantly impacts the design of secure cooperative wireless networks by providing insights into the optimal exploitation of relay nodes. It underscores the necessity of incorporating wiretap link CSI into relay selection processes to enhance physical-layer security significantly.

Future Directions

Future research could explore multi-source and multi-destination scenarios, where opportunistic transmission scheduling may further bolster security against eavesdropping. Additional studies could also focus on real-world implementation challenges such as CSI acquisition and the impact of non-ideal conditions on the performance of the proposed schemes.

In conclusion, this paper provides a comprehensive analysis of relay selection strategies for improving physical-layer security in cooperative wireless networks. The proposed optimal relay selection techniques show promising enhancements over traditional methods, making significant strides in securing communications against potential eavesdropping threats.