Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

l_0 Norm Constraint LMS Algorithm for Sparse System Identification (1303.2261v1)

Published 9 Mar 2013 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: In order to improve the performance of Least Mean Square (LMS) based system identification of sparse systems, a new adaptive algorithm is proposed which utilizes the sparsity property of such systems. A general approximating approach on $l_0$ norm -- a typical metric of system sparsity, is proposed and integrated into the cost function of the LMS algorithm. This integration is equivalent to add a zero attractor in the iterations, by which the convergence rate of small coefficients, that dominate the sparse system, can be effectively improved. Moreover, using partial updating method, the computational complexity is reduced. The simulations demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can effectively improve the performance of LMS-based identification algorithms on sparse system.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Yuantao Gu (60 papers)
  2. Jian Jin (31 papers)
  3. Shunliang Mei (2 papers)
Citations (474)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that incorporating an l0-norm constraint into the LMS algorithm accelerates convergence in identifying sparse systems.
  • The methodology introduces a zero-attractor and partial updating of coefficients to maintain computational efficiency.
  • Simulation results confirm that the l0-LMS outperforms standard adaptive filters like NLMS and IPNLMS in sparse scenarios.

Overview of l0Norm Constraint LMS Algorithm for Sparse System Identification

In exploring efficient methodologies for the identification of sparse systems, this paper introduces an innovative adaptation of the Least Mean Square (LMS) algorithm which incorporates an l0-norm constraint. This approach leverages the inherent sparsity characteristics of certain systems, enhancing the convergence performance in identifying systems with predominantly near-zero impulse response coefficients.

Methodology and Formulation

The LMS algorithm, though widely utilized in adaptive filtering, does not inherently exploit system sparsity. This paper proposes augmenting the LMS cost function by integrating an l0-norm constraint, thereby introducing a zero attractor in the iterative process. The modified algorithm aims to accelerate the convergence of small coefficients, which dominate the sparse nature of systems.

The core of the proposed method involves modifying the traditional LMS update rule with an additional term designed to attract coefficients toward zero. This is achieved through an approximation of the l0-norm using nonlinear functions, allowing for computational feasibility.

The algorithm's computational complexity, traditionally increased by the additional zero-attraction term, is addressed through a partial updating method. Here, only a subset of coefficients is updated at each iteration, markedly reducing overhead and maintaining the algorithm's practical applicability.

Results and Implications

Simulation results demonstrate the enhanced performance of the l0-norm constrained LMS (l0-LMS) over existing algorithms such as NLMS, IPNLMS, and IIPNLMS. Notably, the l0-LMS exhibits a faster convergence rate to steady-state in various sparse system scenarios. This is particularly evident in systems where the number of large coefficients is minimal, highlighting the algorithm's sensitivity to system sparsity.

Discussion and Future Directions

The paper provides a thorough analysis of parameter selection, particularly focusing on the balance between κ, influencing adaptation speed and steady-state performance, and β, determining the attraction range. A tailored selection of these parameters is critical for leveraging the full potential of the l0-LMS in diverse applications.

The implications of this research are significant for fields requiring efficient sparse system identification, such as echo cancellation in digital communication systems. The ability to quickly converge to an accurate representation of a sparse system can lead to improved system performance and reduced computational resources.

Future research might extend this l0-norm constraint approach to other adaptive filtering algorithms beyond LMS, potentially adapting it to nonlinear or non-stationary environments. Additionally, exploring adaptive or data-driven approaches to parameter selection could further enhance the algorithm's robustness and applicability.

In conclusion, this research contributes a valuable advancement in adaptive filtering by integrating sparsity-awareness into the LMS framework, offering an effective tool for researchers and practitioners working with sparse system identifications.