Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

GBM Volumetry using the 3D Slicer Medical Image Computing Platform (1303.0964v1)

Published 5 Mar 2013 in cs.CV

Abstract: Volumetric change in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) over time is a critical factor in treatment decisions. Typically, the tumor volume is computed on a slice-by-slice basis using MRI scans obtained at regular intervals. (3D)Slicer - a free platform for biomedical research - provides an alternative to this manual slice-by-slice segmentation process, which is significantly faster and requires less user interaction. In this study, 4 physicians segmented GBMs in 10 patients, once using the competitive region-growing based GrowCut segmentation module of Slicer, and once purely by drawing boundaries completely manually on a slice-by-slice basis. Furthermore, we provide a variability analysis for three physicians for 12 GBMs. The time required for GrowCut segmentation was on an average 61% of the time required for a pure manual segmentation. A comparison of Slicer-based segmentation with manual slice-by-slice segmentation resulted in a Dice Similarity Coefficient of 88.43 +/- 5.23% and a Hausdorff Distance of 2.32 +/- 5.23 mm.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (10)
  1. Jan Egger (95 papers)
  2. Tina Kapur (23 papers)
  3. Andriy Fedorov (5 papers)
  4. Steve Pieper (18 papers)
  5. James V. Miller (1 paper)
  6. Harini Veeraraghavan (23 papers)
  7. Bernd Freisleben (33 papers)
  8. Alexandra Golby (12 papers)
  9. Christopher Nimsky (19 papers)
  10. Ron Kikinis (27 papers)
Citations (225)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that 3D Slicer's GrowCut algorithm segments GBM tumors with accuracy comparable to manual methods using DSC and HD metrics.
  • The study highlights a significant 39% reduction in segmentation time, making the process more efficient for clinical use.
  • The methodology employs a user-assisted cellular automaton approach that minimizes operator input while ensuring robust and precise tumor delineation.

Overview of GBM Volumetry Using the 3D Slicer Medical Image Computing Platform

The presented paper investigates the efficacy of the 3D Slicer, a freely available medical image computing platform, in segmenting glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors and compares this semi-automated tool to traditional manual, slice-by-slice segmentation techniques. The focus is to observe how effectively the tool can reduce both the time spent and the variability inherent in manual procedures while maintaining similar accuracy levels in tumor volume delineation essential for treatment planning and ongoing patient monitoring.

Study Framework and Results

The research engaged four experienced physicians to employ the GrowCut segmentation tool within 3D Slicer and manually segment GBMs across MRI scans from ten patients. Each method’s performance was assessed via two metrics: the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and the Hausdorff Distance (HD), to quantify the overlap and boundary proximity respectively. The GrowCut segmentation demonstrated a DSC of 88.43 ± 5.23% and an HD of 2.32 ± 5.23 mm, closely aligning with the accuracy of manual segmentations.

Moreover, the paper highlighted a notable reduction in processing times, where GrowCut-based segmentation required, on average, only 61% of the time compared to manual segmentation. Such reductions in time, combined with acceptable accuracy, underscore 3D Slicer's utility in clinical environments that demand efficient processing for GBM volumetric analyses.

Technical Considerations and Methodology

The GrowCut algorithm utilized in 3D Slicer is predicated on a cellular automaton-based approach for interactive, multi-label segmentation, capitalizing on minimal user interaction while rendering consistent outcomes. This technique requires users to identify foreground and background regions, after which the algorithm autonomously refines the segmentation. Significant emphasis was placed on improving computational efficiency and user interaction through a streamlined graphical user interface and multi-threaded execution.

Manual editing tools in 3D Slicer allowed for refinement post-GrowCut application, which contributed to aligning the results closely with clinically acceptable standards demonstrated by the reference manual segmentations performed by neurosurgeons.

Implications and Future Prospects

The findings from this paper are instrumental in advancing semi-automatic medical imaging tools that offer time-effective solutions without sacrificing accuracy, crucial in oncological settings where swift clinical decision-making aids patient prognosis.

Furthermore, the research elucidates pathways for future development within image processing tools. Enhancements could include automated initialization processes, incorporation of advanced statistical modeling of tumor morphology and textural attributes, and iterative refinement to bolster segmentation robustness. The potential expansion to other tumor grades and other anatomical structures could be pivotal in broadening the utility of 3D Slicer in diverse pathological scenarios.

As AI and machine learning continue to infiltrate the domain of medical imaging, leveraging these advancements could further refine tools like 3D Slicer for enhanced precision and predictive analytics, fostering innovations in personalized medicine.