Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A universal, operational theory of unicast multi-user communication with fidelity criteria (1302.5860v1)

Published 24 Feb 2013 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: This is a three part paper. Optimality of source-channel separation for communication with a fidelity criterion when the channel is compound as defined by Csiszar and Korner in their book and general as defined by Verdu and Han, is proved in Part I. It is assumed that random codes are permitted. The word "universal" in the title of this paper refers to the fact that the channel model is compound. The proof uses a layered black-box or a layered input-output view-point. In particular, only the end-to-end description of the channel as being capable of communicating a source to within a certain distortion level is used when proving separation. This implies that the channel model does not play any role for separation to hold as long as there is a source model. Further implications of the layered black-box view-point are discussed. Optimality of source-medium separation for multi-user communication with fidelity criteria over a general, compound medium in the unicast setting is proved in Part II, thus generalizing Part I to the unicast, multi-user setting. Part III gets to an understanding of the question, "Why is a channel which is capable of communicating a source to within a certain distortion level, also capable of communicating bits at any rate less than the infimum of the rates needed to code the source to within the distortion level": this lies at the heart of why optimality of separation for communication with a fidelity criterion holds. The perspective taken to get to this understanding is a randomized covering-packing perspective, and the proof is operational.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.