Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Parameterized Approximation Algorithm for The Shallow-Light Steiner Tree Problem (1212.3403v2)

Published 14 Dec 2012 in cs.DS

Abstract: For a given graph $G=(V,\, E)$ with a terminal set $S$ and a selected root $r\in S$, a positive integer cost and a delay on every edge and a delay constraint $D\in Z{+}$, the shallow-light Steiner tree (\emph{SLST}) problem is to compute a minimum cost tree spanning the terminals of $S$, in which the delay between root and every vertex is restrained by $D$. This problem is NP-hard and very hard to approximate. According to known inapproximability results, this problem admits no approximation with ratio better than factor $(1,\, O(\log{2}n))$ unless $NP\subseteq DTIME(n{\log\log n})$ \cite{khandekar2013some}, while it admits no approximation ratio better than $(1,\, O(\log|V|))$ for D=4 unless $NP\subseteq DTIME(n{\log\log n})$ \cite{bar2001generalized}. Hence, the paper focus on parameterized algorithm for \emph{SLST}. We firstly present an exact algorithm for \emph{SLST} with time complexity $O(3{|S|}|V|D+2{|S|}|V|{2}D{2}+|V|{3}D{3})$, where $|S|$ and $|V|$ are the number of terminals and vertices respectively. This is a pseudo polynomial time parameterized algorithm with respect to the parameterization: "number of terminals". Later, we improve this algorithm such that it runs in polynomial time $O(\frac{|V|{2}}{\epsilon}3{|S|}+\frac{|V|{4}}{\epsilon}2{|S|}+\frac{|V|{6}}{\epsilon})$, and computes a Steiner tree with delay bounded by $(1+\epsilon)D$ and cost bounded by the cost of an optimum solution, where $\epsilon>0$ is any small real number. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first parameterized approximation algorithm for the \emph{SLST} problem.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Longkun Guo (12 papers)
  2. Kewen Liao (11 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.