Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Stochastic Superoptimization (1211.0557v1)

Published 2 Nov 2012 in cs.PF and cs.PL

Abstract: We formulate the loop-free, binary superoptimization task as a stochastic search problem. The competing constraints of transformation correctness and performance improvement are encoded as terms in a cost function, and a Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampler is used to rapidly explore the space of all possible programs to find one that is an optimization of a given target program. Although our method sacrifices com- pleteness, the scope of programs we are able to reason about, and the quality of the programs we produce, far exceed those of existing superoptimizers. Beginning from binaries com- piled by llvm -O0 for 64-bit X86, our prototype implemen- tation, STOKE, is able to produce programs which either match or outperform the code sequences produced by gcc with full optimizations enabled, and, in some cases, expert handwritten assembly.

Citations (334)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a stochastic approach to superoptimization by framing program optimization as a cost minimization problem that balances correctness and performance.
  • It employs a Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampler to explore loop-free assembly programs, achieving competitive or superior performance compared to gcc and expert handcrafts.
  • STOKE’s evaluation on benchmarks like Montgomery multiplication and Hacker's Delight kernels highlights significant efficiency gains and challenges traditional instruction-level optimization.

Stochastic Superoptimization: A Comprehensive Overview

The paper "Stochastic Superoptimization" by Eric Schkufza, Rahul Sharma, and Alex Aiken presents an innovative approach to superoptimization by framing the problem as a stochastic search. Unlike classical compilers that solve optimization tasks by decomposing them into independent subproblems, this research formulates program optimization as a cost minimization problem. This reformulation allows for the simultaneous consideration of transformation correctness and performance improvement, which are encoded as terms in a complex cost function.

Overview of Methodology

The proposed approach utilizes a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampler to explore the vast search space of possible loop-free assembly programs. Although completeness is sacrificed, the authors argue convincingly that the enhanced scope of programs amenable to analysis and the resulting improvements in performance quality outweigh this drawback.

STOKE, the prototype implementation demonstrated in the paper, optimizes 64-bit X86 binaries starting from code sequences produced by the llvm -O0 compiler. Remarkably, STOKE is capable of generating code that not only competes with but in some cases outperforms the aggressively optimized code produced by gcc and even expert handwritten assembly.

Key Contributions and Results

The paper illustrates several instances where STOKE successfully produces superior code. For example, in the Montgomery multiplication kernel derived from the OpenSSL library, STOKE's optimized version is notably shorter and faster than gcc's output. Such improvements underscore the potential of the stochastic approach when applied to complex code sequences that standard compilation techniques cannot optimize to the same extent.

A critical aspect of the system is its separation of synthesis and optimization phases. STOKE begins with a random starting point for synthesis to locate regions of equivalent programs and subsequently focuses on optimization to refine performance. This stratified approach facilitates the discovery of algorithmically distinct rewrites, which may not be achievable by traditional methods focused on local optimizations.

Comparative Evaluation

The evaluation of STOKE on numerous benchmarks, including challenging Hacker's Delight kernels and SAXPY operations from BLAS, demonstrates its effectiveness. The system not only matches but frequently surpasses the performance of code optimized with state-of-the-art compilers. Importantly, in several cases, STOKE uncovers optimizations through a complete reimagining of the assembly algorithm rather than mere instruction-level improvements.

Limitations and Future Directions

Despite the impressive results, the authors acknowledge limitations, particularly related to handling loops and specific benchmarks with deceptive simplicity, such as those producing a single-bit difference. Future research is indicated to address these challenges by developing mechanisms for validating and optimizing loop-containing codes and refining the synthesis cost function further.

Implications and Speculation

The theoretical implications of this approach suggest a significant shift in understanding compiler optimization towards a holistic consideration of entire programs, as opposed to isolated instruction sequences. Practically, such techniques could see widespread application in high-performance computing domains where even minor gains in efficiency translate to substantial resource savings.

For future developments in AI and machine learning, stochastic superoptimization might serve as a foundational element for more advanced code generation and optimization tools, potentially leveraging AI to enhance the search and synthesis process.

In conclusion, stochastic superoptimization offers a novel lens through which program optimization is viewed, challenging traditional paradigms and laying the groundwork for innovative approaches that balance correctness with unparalleled performance improvements.