Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The current state of fractal billiards (1210.0282v3)

Published 1 Oct 2012 in math.DS

Abstract: If D is a rational polygon, then the associated rational billiard table is given by \Omega(D). Such a billiard table is well understood. If F is a closed fractal curve approximated by a sequence of rational polygons, then the corresponding fractal billiard table is denoted by \Omega(F). In this paper, we survey many of the results from [LapNie1-3] for the Koch snowflake fractal billiard \Omega(KS) and announce new results on two other fractal billiard tables, namely, the T-fractal billiard table \Omega(T) (see [LapNie6]) and a self-similar Sierpinski carpet billiard table \Omega(S_a) (see [CheNie]). We build a general framework within which to analyze what we call a sequence of compatible orbits. Properties of particular sequences of compatible orbits are discussed for each prefractal billiard \Omega(KS_n), \Omega(T_n) and \Omega(S_a,n), for n = 0, 1, 2... . In each case, we are able to determine a particular limiting behavior for an appropriately formulated sequence of compatible orbits. Such a limit either constitutes what we call a nontrivial path of a fractal billiard table \Omega(F) or else a periodic orbit of \Omega(F) with finite period. In our examples, F will be either KS, T or S_a. Several of the results and examples discussed in this paper are presented for the first time. We then close with a brief discussion of open problems and directions for further research in the emerging field of fractal billiards.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.