Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Parallelizing Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoffs with Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization (1206.6402v1)

Published 27 Jun 2012 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: Can one parallelize complex exploration exploitation tradeoffs? As an example, consider the problem of optimal high-throughput experimental design, where we wish to sequentially design batches of experiments in order to simultaneously learn a surrogate function mapping stimulus to response and identify the maximum of the function. We formalize the task as a multi-armed bandit problem, where the unknown payoff function is sampled from a Gaussian process (GP), and instead of a single arm, in each round we pull a batch of several arms in parallel. We develop GP-BUCB, a principled algorithm for choosing batches, based on the GP-UCB algorithm for sequential GP optimization. We prove a surprising result; as compared to the sequential approach, the cumulative regret of the parallel algorithm only increases by a constant factor independent of the batch size B. Our results provide rigorous theoretical support for exploiting parallelism in Bayesian global optimization. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on two real-world applications.

Citations (463)

Summary

  • The paper introduces the GP-BUCB algorithm that extends GP-UCB to batch selection, enabling parallel exploration-exploitation trade-offs.
  • It achieves near-linear speedup with rigorous cumulative regret bounds and lazy evaluation techniques to handle asynchronous feedback efficiently.
  • Empirical results on synthetic benchmarks and real-world applications like automated vaccine design show that GP-BUCB outperforms existing methods in complex optimization tasks.

Parallelizing Exploration-Exploitation Trade-offs with Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization

This paper addresses the parallelization of exploration-exploitation trade-offs within the context of Gaussian Process (GP) Bandit Optimization. The primary contribution is the development of a new algorithm, GP-BUCB (Gaussian Process Batch Upper Confidence Bound), which extends the GP-UCB framework to facilitate batch selection of experiments.

Problem Context and Motivation

The exploration-exploitation dilemma arises in a myriad of applications, including recommender systems and experimental design. Within the scope of optimization, understanding and balancing the trade-offs between exploring unknown opportunities and exploiting known profitable ones is crucial. The paper models this problem as a multi-armed bandit (MAB) scenario, with the payoff function being observed through a GP.

A specific challenge the authors tackle is the desire to parallelize decision-making. Traditional approaches operate sequentially, which can be inefficient in contexts like high-throughput experimental design or complex control tasks where simultaneous decision-making and delayed feedback handling are necessary.

GP-BUCB Algorithm

The GP-BUCB algorithm generalizes the GP-UCB by selecting batches of experiments instead of individual experiments sequentially. This approach enables the consideration of multiple arms in parallel, effectively incorporating information once the entire batch is completed. A notable theoretical result is that the cumulative regret of the parallel algorithm only increases by a constant factor, independent of the batch size, compared to the sequential approach.

The methodology is underpinned by rigorous proofs showing that GP-BUCB's performance approaches near-linear speedup, especially with common kernel functions. Asynchronous feedback handling is addressed by computing predictive variances for the proposed experiments ahead of feedback realization, thereby maintaining computational efficiency using lazy evaluations.

Theoretical and Empirical Validation

The theoretical framework is substantiated with bounds on cumulative regret, asserting that it remains sublinear in nature. This assurance relies on an understanding of the mutual information gained throughout the process, an essential factor in determining the regret's growth.

Empirically, the paper presents evaluations on synthetic benchmarks and real-world studies, specifically automated vaccine design and therapeutic spinal cord stimulation. GP-BUCB demonstrates competitive performance, often outperforming existing methods, especially when dealing with tasks that entail complex, multimodal data distributions.

Implications and Future Directions

The introduction of GP-BUCB offers a compelling approach to leveraging batch processing in Bayesian optimization with sound theoretical guarantees. This advancement has practical implications for scientific fields requiring efficient experimentation cycles. Future developments could explore adaptive batch sizing, integration with deep learning paradigms, or applications in domains like finance and autonomous systems where similar exploration-exploitation challenges exist.

Conclusion

This work makes significant strides in optimizing exploration-exploitation trade-offs within Gaussian process frameworks. By extending batch processes, the algorithm enhances computational efficiency and effectiveness, fostering the broader applicability of Bayesian optimization methods in real-world, high-dimensional problems. The potential for further exploration into adaptive methodologies offers a promising avenue for continued research and application across varied domains.