Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Activity driven modeling of time varying networks (1203.5351v4)

Published 23 Mar 2012 in physics.soc-ph, cond-mat.stat-mech, and cs.SI

Abstract: Network modeling plays a critical role in identifying statistical regularities and structural principles common to many systems. The large majority of recent modeling approaches are connectivity driven. The structural patterns of the network are at the basis of the mechanisms ruling the network formation. Connectivity driven models necessarily provide a time-aggregated representation that may fail to describe the instantaneous and fluctuating dynamics of many networks. We address this challenge by defining the activity potential, a time invariant function characterizing the agents' interactions and constructing an activity driven model capable of encoding the instantaneous time description of the network dynamics. The model provides an explanation of structural features such as the presence of hubs, which simply originate from the heterogeneous activity of agents. Within this framework, highly dynamical networks can be described analytically, allowing a quantitative discussion of the biases induced by the time-aggregated representations in the analysis of dynamical processes.

Citations (555)

Summary

  • The paper proposes an activity-driven model using node activity potential to capture transient network interactions, addressing limitations of static representations.
  • The model employs a Markovian process that assigns firing rates to nodes, with validation on large-scale datasets from collaborations, social media, and film networks.
  • The approach reveals significant deviations in epidemic spread predictions, highlighting biases inherent in time-aggregated network views.

Activity Driven Modeling of Time-Varying Networks

The paper "Activity Driven Modeling of Time Varying Networks" by Nicola Perra et al. addresses a critical limitation in network modeling associated with time-aggregated representations. Existing models often emphasize connectivity-driven frameworks, which tend to overlook the dynamic and instantaneous nature of interactions within networks. This paper proposes an activity-driven model to capture the temporal dynamics essential for accurately representing networks where interactions are transient and rapidly fluctuating.

Key Contributions

The authors introduce a novel approach based on the concept of activity potential, which measures how actively nodes within a network initiate interactions over specified time windows. This metric facilitates the modeling of network dynamics without relying on time-scale separation assumptions, a common practice in previous studies. The model is validated through empirical analysis of three large-scale, time-resolved datasets encompassing collaborations in "Physical Review Letters", interactions on Twitter, and connections between actors in IMDb.

Empirical Foundations

The analysis is rooted in the activity potential of individual agents, determined by the number of interactions in a set time window relative to total network interactions. The datasets demonstrate that, unlike conventional degree distributions, the activity potential distribution remains stable across different time scales, highlighting its robustness as a measure of node activity.

The Model

The proposed activity-driven model assigns an activity or firing rate to each node, dictating the probability of interaction initiation. At each discrete time interval, nodes may become active, generating connections with a set number of other randomly selected nodes, and these connections are ephemeral. This Markovian process results in a dynamic network structure heavily informed by the distribution of node activities.

Analytical Insights

The model offers an analytical framework to understand how dynamic network topology influences dynamical processes such as epidemic spreading. It demonstrates the biases introduced by time-aggregated views, especially when these networks and processes evolve on comparable time scales. Specifically, the model reveals deviations in predictions of epidemic spread when analyzed using static, aggregated networks versus dynamic, activity-driven networks.

Implications and Future Directions

The work provides a versatile framework for modeling rapidly evolving networks and can be extended to address dynamical processes such as synchronization and collective behavior. However, it acknowledges limitations in capturing factors like persistence and weighted interactions. Future research should consider integrating these complexities to enhance the realism and applicability of the model.

Conclusion

The paper advances the understanding of time-varying networks by shifting focus from static connectivity to dynamic activity-driven interactions. This approach not only enhances the accuracy of network representations but also illuminates the intricate interplay between network dynamics and processes occurring on these networks. As availability of high-resolution temporal data increases, the applicability and refinement of such models will be pivotal in advancing the field of network science.