Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Ad Serving Using a Compact Allocation Plan (1203.3593v1)

Published 16 Mar 2012 in cs.DS

Abstract: A large fraction of online display advertising is sold via guaranteed contracts: a publisher guarantees to the advertiser a certain number of user visits satisfying the targeting predicates of the contract. The publisher is then tasked with solving the ad serving problem - given a user visit, which of the thousands of matching contracts should be displayed, so that by the expiration time every contract has obtained the requisite number of user visits. The challenges of the problem come from (1) the sheer size of the problem being solved, with tens of thousands of contracts and billions of user visits, (2) the unpredictability of user behavior, since these contracts are sold months ahead of time, when only a forecast of user visits is available and (3) the minute amount of resources available online, as an ad server must respond with a matching contract in a fraction of a second. We present a solution to the guaranteed delivery ad serving problem using {\em compact allocation plans}. These plans, computed offline, can be efficiently queried by the ad server during an ad call; they are small, using only O(1) space for contract; and are stateless, allowing for distributed serving without any central coordination. We evaluate this approach on a real set of user visits and guaranteed contracts and show that the compact allocation plans are an effective way of solving the guaranteed delivery ad serving problem.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Peiji Chen (2 papers)
  2. Wenjing Ma (7 papers)
  3. Srinath Mandalapu (1 paper)
  4. Chandrashekhar Nagarajan (2 papers)
  5. Jayavel Shanmugasundaram (2 papers)
  6. Sergei Vassilvitskii (45 papers)
  7. Erik Vee (14 papers)
  8. Manfai Yu (1 paper)
  9. Jason Zien (1 paper)
Citations (25)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.