Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Some Results on the Target Set Selection Problem (1111.6685v1)

Published 29 Nov 2011 in math.CO, cs.CC, cs.DM, cs.DS, and cs.SI

Abstract: In this paper we consider a fundamental problem in the area of viral marketing, called T{\scriptsize ARGET} S{\scriptsize ET} S{\scriptsize ELECTION} problem. We study the problem when the underlying graph is a block-cactus graph, a chordal graph or a Hamming graph. We show that if $G$ is a block-cactus graph, then the T{\scriptsize ARGET} S{\scriptsize ET} S{\scriptsize ELECTION} problem can be solved in linear time, which generalizes Chen's result \cite{chen2009} for trees, and the time complexity is much better than the algorithm in \cite{treewidth} (for bounded treewidth graphs) when restricted to block-cactus graphs. We show that if the underlying graph $G$ is a chordal graph with thresholds $\theta(v)\leq 2$ for each vertex $v$ in $G$, then the problem can be solved in linear time. For a Hamming graph $G$ having thresholds $\theta(v)=2$ for each vertex $v$ of $G$, we precisely determine an optimal target set $S$ for $(G,\theta)$. These results partially answer an open problem raised by Dreyer and Roberts \cite{Dreyer2009}.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Chun-Ying Chiang (3 papers)
  2. Liang-Hao Huang (7 papers)
  3. Bo-Jr Li (1 paper)
  4. Jiaojiao Wu (3 papers)
  5. Hong-Gwa Yeh (3 papers)
Citations (71)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.