Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Modern hierarchical, agglomerative clustering algorithms (1109.2378v1)

Published 12 Sep 2011 in stat.ML and cs.DS

Abstract: This paper presents algorithms for hierarchical, agglomerative clustering which perform most efficiently in the general-purpose setup that is given in modern standard software. Requirements are: (1) the input data is given by pairwise dissimilarities between data points, but extensions to vector data are also discussed (2) the output is a "stepwise dendrogram", a data structure which is shared by all implementations in current standard software. We present algorithms (old and new) which perform clustering in this setting efficiently, both in an asymptotic worst-case analysis and from a practical point of view. The main contributions of this paper are: (1) We present a new algorithm which is suitable for any distance update scheme and performs significantly better than the existing algorithms. (2) We prove the correctness of two algorithms by Rohlf and Murtagh, which is necessary in each case for different reasons. (3) We give well-founded recommendations for the best current algorithms for the various agglomerative clustering schemes.

Citations (606)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel algorithm that efficiently handles any distance update scheme, outperforming traditional centroid and median clustering methods.
  • The paper provides rigorous correctness proofs for established algorithms, including Rohlf’s single linkage and Murtagh’s NN-chain methods.
  • The paper offers comprehensive performance evaluations and algorithm recommendations to enhance practical clustering in diverse applications.

Analysis of Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Algorithms

The paper by Daniel Müllner presents an in-depth paper of hierarchical agglomerative clustering algorithms, which are integral to the analysis of complex data sets in numerous scientific and industrial applications. The research introduces new methodologies and provides a comprehensive evaluation of existing algorithms, effectively bridging the gap between theoretical advances and practical implementations.

Key Contributions

The paper makes several significant contributions:

  1. Introduction of a New Algorithm: Müllner presents a novel algorithm designed to efficiently handle any distance update scheme, demonstrating superior performance compared to existing algorithms, particularly for the centroid and median clustering schemes.
  2. Correctness Proofs: The paper provides missing proofs of correctness for two established algorithms—Rohlf’s single linkage algorithm and Murtagh’s nearest-neighbor-chain (NN-chain) algorithm. These proofs are essential for ensuring reliable implementation in practical applications.
  3. Algorithm Recommendations: A well-founded analysis recommends the most effective algorithms for different agglomerative clustering schemes, offering insights into their comparative strengths and weaknesses.

Algorithmic Insights

Müllner evaluates various hierarchical clustering algorithms using the Sequential, Agglomerative, Hierarchic, Non-overlapping (SAHN) methods framework. The analysis focuses on:

  • MST-Linkage Algorithm: Ideal for single linkage clustering, leveraging Prim’s algorithm for constructing a minimum spanning tree. This approach is optimal in terms of both computational efficiency and memory usage.
  • NN-Chain Algorithm: Recommended for clustering methods excluding centroid and median, due to its robust performance and consistency with theoretical efficiency.
  • Generic Algorithm: This new development is particularly suited for centroid and median methods, handling inversions in the dendrogram efficiently. Müllner provides a variant optimized for vector data representations, reducing computational overhead in practical applications.

Performance Evaluation

The paper extensively analyzes the computational complexity of these algorithms, noting:

  • Quadratic Time Complexity: The MST and NN-chain algorithms both exhibit Θ(N2)\Theta(N^2) complexity, which Müllner identifies as optimal given the problem constraints.
  • Practical Use-Case Performance: The research includes empirical evaluation across diverse data sets, confirming the theoretical findings and demonstrating that the newly proposed algorithm maintains efficient performance across a range of scenarios.

Implications and Future Directions

The work has significant implications for both theoretical and applied clustering tasks:

  • Practical Implementations: The recommendations and new algorithm implementations are positioned to enhance clustering tasks in software packages like R, MATLAB, and Python, which are extensively used in scientific and industrial settings.
  • Extensions to Vector Data: The exploration of extensions to vector data lays the groundwork for optimizing SAHN methods in higher-dimensional spaces, presenting opportunities for further refinement and specialization based on specific application needs.
  • Encouragement for Further Research: By addressing the limitations and providing performance proofs, the paper encourages additional exploration into dynamic and multidimensional extensions of clustering algorithms.

Müllner’s research effectively advances the understanding of hierarchical, agglomerative clustering algorithms, providing both theoretical clarity and practical tools that can be readily adopted in various domains. The balance between rigorous theoretical analysis and practical applicability exemplifies a comprehensive paper, making it a substantial contribution to the field of computational data analysis.