Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Volatility of Power Grids under Real-Time Pricing (1106.1401v1)

Published 7 Jun 2011 in cs.SY, math.DS, math.OC, and q-fin.PR

Abstract: The paper proposes a framework for modeling and analysis of the dynamics of supply, demand, and clearing prices in power system with real-time retail pricing and information asymmetry. Real-time retail pricing is characterized by passing on the real-time wholesale electricity prices to the end consumers, and is shown to create a closed-loop feedback system between the physical layer and the market layer of the power system. In the absence of a carefully designed control law, such direct feedback between the two layers could increase volatility and lower the system's robustness to uncertainty in demand and generation. A new notion of generalized price-elasticity is introduced, and it is shown that price volatility can be characterized in terms of the system's maximal relative price elasticity, defined as the maximal ratio of the generalized price-elasticity of consumers to that of the producers. As this ratio increases, the system becomes more volatile, and eventually, unstable. As new demand response technologies and distributed storage increase the price-elasticity of demand, the architecture under examination is likely to lead to increased volatility and possibly instability. This highlights the need for assessing architecture systematically and in advance, in order to optimally strike the trade-offs between volatility, economic efficiency, and system reliability.

Citations (361)

Summary

  • The paper establishes that real-time pricing creates a closed feedback system that can heighten grid volatility.
  • It introduces maximal relative price elasticity (MRPE) to measure the impact of consumer responsiveness on system stability.
  • The study employs Lyapunov methods to develop stability criteria, offering a framework for designing resilient smart grids.

An Analysis of the Volatility in Power Grids Induced by Real-Time Pricing

The paper entitled "Volatility of Power Grids under Real-Time Pricing" by Roozbehani, Dahleh, and Mitter explores the implications of real-time retail pricing on the dynamics of power systems. This research is grounded in the ambition to modernize power grids, enhancing their capacity to integrate renewable energy sources at scale. With real-time pricing, wholesale market prices are directly passed onto consumers, creating a proactive interaction between demand and supply. This interaction forms a feedback loop which could potentially increase volatility and decrease system robustness due to demands' uncertain behaviors.

Real-Time Pricing and Feedback Dynamics

Real-time pricing (RTP) connects wholesale market prices directly to consumers, inducing a feedback loop. The significant insight from this research is the characterization of this loop as a closed feedback system, where the interaction between the physical power system and market economics could increase volatility or lead to instability without adequate control mechanisms. The direct connection between prices and consumer decisions, enhanced by new demand-response technologies, contributes to the system's heightened volatility, primarily when generalized price-elasticity among consumers outpaces that of producers.

Price Elasticity and System Stability

A novel concept introduced in this paper is the generalized price-elasticity, defined as the ratio of consumer price elasticity to producer price elasticity. This ratio's escalation suggests increased system volatility, potentially destabilizing it when surpassing certain thresholds. The concept of maximal relative price elasticity (MRPE) is pivotal in evaluating system stability. The authors demonstrate that as MRPE approaches or exceeds one, system volatility intensifies, possibly resulting in instability. This insight is critical as power systems integrate more responsive demand technologies and storage capabilities, which inherently increase the price elasticity of demand.

Analytical Framework and Stability Criteria

The paper provides robust mathematical constructs, utilizing Lyapunov analytical methods to establish stability criteria for the proposed feedback systems. By characterizing system volatility through demand elasticity ratios, it sets the groundwork for strategic interventions. The authors argue for methodically exploring the trade-offs between market efficiency, system robustness, and volatility. They emphasize assessing system architectures in advance through these analytical models to balance economic efficiency against system reliability.

Implications and Future Outlook

The implications of this work are substantive for both traditional energy markets and renewable integration strategies. In markets with increasing renewables and demand-side participation, the dynamics become more uncertain and complex. Therefore, this research suggests assessing existing system architectures to preemptively mitigate risk and volatility.

This paper sets the precedence for future investigations into the potential requirement for a layered control system that separates economic and physical feedbacks. The trade-offs highlighted between economic and environmental efficiency against volatility offer fertile ground for further exploration, especially considering information asymmetry between consumers and system operators. An unresolved issue stays around the value of real-time data acquisition from consumers, which could help bridge information gaps and supply more precise elasticity measures.

Conclusion

Conclusively, this paper provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the ramifications of real-time pricing mechanisms in power systems. By systematically relating generalized price-elasticity to system stability and market operations, it opens avenues for more nuanced designs of energy market structures, suggesting that future power market designs must balance price responsiveness with systemic robustness and reliability. This analysis is indispensable for developing smart grids equipped to handle dynamic pricing paradigms, ensuring that market operations do not compromise grid stability or economic efficiency.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com