Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
88 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
11 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
52 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
10 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
33 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Flash Deprecated
12 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The NAO humanoid: a combination of performance and affordability (0807.3223v2)

Published 21 Jul 2008 in cs.RO

Abstract: This article presents the design of the autonomous humanoid robot called NAO that is built by the French company Aldebaran-Robotics. With its height of 0.57 m and its weight about 4.5 kg, this innovative robot is lightweight and compact. It distinguishes itself from its existing Japanese, American, and other counterparts thanks to its pelvis kinematics design, its proprietary actuation system based on brush DC motors, its electronic, computer and distributed software architectures. This robot has been designed to be affordable without sacrificing quality and performance. It is an open and easy-to-handle platform where the user can change all the embedded system software or just add some applications to make the robot adopt specific behaviours. The robot's head and forearms are modular and can be changed to promote further evolution. The comprehensive and functional design is one of the reasons that helped select NAO to replace the AIBO quadrupeds in the 2008 RoboCup standard league.

Citations (179)

Summary

  • The analysis of arXiv record 0807.3223 demonstrates the impossibility of summarizing or assessing papers when their core content is inaccessible.
  • The absence of accessible research documentation prevents the extraction and evaluation of specific technical results, claims, and implications.
  • This situation underscores the critical need for accessible, well-documented research records and standardized protocols to ensure effective dissemination and advancement of scientific knowledge.

Analysis of arXiv Paper Record: (0807.3223)v2

The record for arXiv paper (0807.3223)v2 signifies an absence of accessible content or metadata, rendering a conclusive analysis or summary impossible. The lack of a PDF or any form of an extended abstract restricts the extraction of critical research insights or technical accomplishments associated with this document. Consequently, any supposed numerical results, theoretical claims, or implications cannot be appropriately assessed or elaborated upon.

Despite the limitations presented by the absence of data in this specific entry, it underscores the importance of comprehensive and accessible documentation within academic research repositories. The dissemination of scholarly work is fundamentally reliant on the availability and preservation of informational resources that exemplify the scope, methodologies, and conclusions drawn within the research.

In a broader context, the scenario observed with paper (0807.3223)v2 illustrates the need for continued efforts towards enhancing the transparency and accessibility of research outputs. Establishing standardized protocols for metadata provision and the maintenance of archival literature can significantly improve access and usability, which is critical for fostering an interconnected and inclusive academic community.

To surmise, while the inability to review the specific content of this paper restricts any detailed technical analysis, it accentuates a crucial infrastructural aspect of research dissemination that holds implications for the scientific community as a whole. Future developments in AI and other fields necessitate robust platforms that ensure open access and reliable documentation to advance research frontiers effectively.