Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Generalized Degrees of Freedom of the Symmetric Gaussian $K$ User Interference Channel (0804.4489v1)

Published 28 Apr 2008 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: We characterize the generalized degrees of freedom of the $K$ user symmetric Gaussian interference channel where all desired links have the same signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and all undesired links carrying interference have the same interference-to-noise ratio, ${INR}={SNR}\alpha$. We find that the number of generalized degrees of freedom per user, $d(\alpha)$, does not depend on the number of users, so that the characterization is identical to the 2 user interference channel with the exception of a singularity at $\alpha=1$ where $d(1)=\frac{1}{K}$. The achievable schemes use multilevel coding with a nested lattice structure that opens the possibility that the sum of interfering signals can be decoded at a receiver even though the messages carried by the interfering signals are not decodable.

Citations (200)

Summary

Generalized Degrees of Freedom of the Symmetric Gaussian K User Interference Channel

This paper by Syed A. Jafar and Sriram Vishwanath presents a thorough analysis of the generalized degrees of freedom (GDOF) for the symmetric Gaussian interference channel with KK users. The investigation seeks to extend insights from the two-user interference channel, particularly the characterization of the degrees of freedom, to scenarios with more than two users while maintaining a symmetric channel model with uniform SNR for desired links and an interference-to-noise ratio (INR) defined as $\mbox{INR}=\mbox{SNR}^\alpha$ for undesired links.

Core Contribution and Results

The core contribution of the paper is the derivation and characterization of the GDOF per user, denoted as d(α)d(\alpha), which intriguingly remains invariant with respect to the number of users, KK, except at α=1\alpha=1. The authors demonstrate that only at this point does the GDOF change, where d(1)=1Kd(1)=\frac{1}{K}. This holds significant theoretical implications, as it offers a simplified perspective on managing and predicting the behavior of systems with varying channel parameters. The results suggest that the interference regime, elegantly described in earlier works for two-user models, could be extended to multi-user systems while retaining its core structural properties.

The GDOF is comprehensively outlined as:

  • Noisy Interference (0α120 \leq \alpha \leq \frac{1}{2}): d(α)=1αd(\alpha)=1-\alpha
  • Weak Interference (12α23\frac{1}{2} \leq \alpha \leq \frac{2}{3}): d(α)=αd(\alpha)=\alpha
  • Moderately Weak Interference (23α<1\frac{2}{3} \leq \alpha < 1): d(α)=1α2d(\alpha)=1-\frac{\alpha}{2}
  • Singularity at α=1\alpha=1: d(α)=1Kd(\alpha)=\frac{1}{K}
  • Strong Interference (1<α21 < \alpha \leq 2): d(α)=α2d(\alpha)=\frac{\alpha}{2}
  • Very Strong Interference (α2\alpha \geq 2): d(α)=1d(\alpha)=1

Methodology and Achievable Schemes

The analysis employs a combination of multilevel coding with a nested lattice structure to allow for possible decoding of the sum of interfering signals even when their respective messages remain undecodable. Various strategies for different interference regimes were elaborated, each with its bounds and achievability proof to support the GDOF characterization. For instance, in the very strong interference regime, the interference can be canceled entirely due to the structure of alignment across signal levels. Conversely, under noisy interference, Gaussian codebooks with interference treated as noise are optimal in the degrees of freedom sense.

Implications and Future Directions

This characterization of the GDOF impacts both the theoretical understanding and practical design of communication systems, suggesting efficient interference management strategies and resource allocation in wireless networks. The findings also hint at the potential for simplifying network designs under symmetric conditions with respect to channel coefficients.

Future research could extend these results to non-symmetric or asymmetric channel conditions, explore potential applications in networks with complex signals, and consider time-variant or frequency-selective channels. Furthermore, there is a pathway to developing approximate capacity characterizations within a constant gap, similar to existing results in simpler two-user systems, to enhance understanding of more complex interference networks.

This paper reinforces the importance of structured signal processing and strategic alignment in network systems, paving the way for further explorations into interference channels and their broader implications in network theory and practice.