---
title: Variance-Gamma Scaled Self-Decomposable Process
url: https://www.emergentmind.com/topics/variance-gamma-scaled-self-decomposable-process
type: topic
---

# Variance-Gamma Scaled Self-Decomposable Process

A variance-gamma scaled self-decomposable process is a variance-gamma-type Lévy process whose construction uses self-decomposability either through a Thorin-subordinated Brownian motion or through the self-decomposability remainder of the gamma law. In the framework of Buchmann–Lu–Madan, the classical variance-gamma process \(V_t=B(G(t))\) arises by subordinating an \(n\)-dimensional Brownian motion \(B\sim BM^n(\mu,\Sigma)\) with an independent gamma subordinator \(G\sim Ts(b)\), while weak subordination extends this construction to arbitrary multivariate subordinators and dependent Brownian components [1609.04481]. In the framework of Gardini–Sabino–Sasso, the Variance Gamma++ process is obtained by replacing the classical gamma subordinator with the \(a\)-remainder from the self-decomposability of the gamma law, introducing an additional scaling parameter \(\kappa=a\in(0,1)\) [2106.15452]. Within the broader weak variance generalised gamma convolution class, self-decomposability is guaranteed for a driftless Brownian subordinate, and under explicit moment conditions on the Thorin measure this condition is also necessary in dimensions \(n\ge 2\) [1712.03640].

## 1. Classical variance-gamma structure and weak subordination

The classical variance-gamma process is defined by
\[
V_t=B(G(t)), \qquad t\ge 0,
\]
where \(B\sim BM^n(\mu,\Sigma)\) and \(G\sim Ts(b)\) are independent. Its characteristic exponent at \(t=1\) is
\[
\Psi_{VG}(\theta)= -\,b\;\ln\!\frac{b - i\langle\theta,\mu\rangle +\tfrac12\langle\theta,\Sigma\theta\rangle}{b}, \qquad \theta\in\mathbb R^n.
\]
The associated Lévy density can be written explicitly in terms of the modified Bessel function \(K_\nu\) [1609.04481].

Weak subordination generalizes both univariate and multivariate subordination. If \(X\sim L^n(p,\Sigma,\mathcal X)\) is an arbitrary \(n\)-dimensional Lévy process and \(T\sim S^n(d,\mathcal T)\) is any \(n\)-dimensional subordinator, then there exists a \(2n\)-dimensional Lévy process \(Z=(T,Y)\) whose projection \(Y\) is written
\[
Y=X\odot T.
\]
Its characteristic exponent satisfies
\[
\Psi_Y(\theta)= i\langle d,\theta\rangle + \tfrac12\langle d\Sigma\theta,\theta\rangle
+ \int_{[0,\infty)^n}\bigl(e^{\Psi_X(t;\theta)}-1\bigr)\,\mathcal T(dt),
\]
and its marginal Lévy measure is
\[
\nu_Y(dx)= d\,\mathcal X(dx)+\int_{[0,\infty)^n}\mathbb P\{X(t)\in dx\}\,\mathcal T(dt).
\]
This construction allows arbitrary dependent-component Lévy processes and arbitrary multivariate subordinators, so it supports both common jumps and idiosyncratic jumps in multivariate settings [1609.04481].

## 2. Weak variance generalised gamma convolutions

The weak variance generalised gamma convolution class is formed by weakly subordinating Brownian motion with a Thorin subordinator. Let
\[
B=(B(t))_{t\ge0}\sim BM^n(\mu,\Sigma),
\qquad
S=(S(t))_{t\ge0}\sim GGC^n_S(d,\nu),
\]
with \(B\) and \(S\) independent, \(\mu\in\mathbb R^n\), \(\Sigma\succ 0\), \(d\ge 0\), and Thorin measure \(\nu\) on \([0,\infty)^n_*\) satisfying
\[
\int_{[0,\infty)_*^n}\Bigl[(1+\ln^-\|u\|)\wedge(1/\|u\|)\Bigr]\,\nu(du)<\infty.
\]
The weakly subordinated process
\[
X_t = B\odot S := (B_1(S_1(t)),\dots,B_n(S_n(t)))
\]
is called a weak variance generalised gamma convolution process and is denoted
\[
X\sim WVGG^n(d,\mu,\Sigma,\nu).
\]
Its characteristic exponent is
\[
\Psi(\theta)
=
i\langle\mu,\theta\rangle
-\tfrac12\|\theta\|^2_\Sigma
-\int_{[0,\infty)^n_*}
\ln\!\Bigl(\tfrac{\|u\|^2+ \tfrac12\|\theta\|^2_\Sigma}{\|u\|^2}\Bigr)\,\nu(du),
\qquad \theta\in\mathbb R^n.
\]
In the related \(VGG^n(d,p,\Sigma,U)\) notation, the classical variance-gamma model is recovered by taking \(d=0\) and \(U=b\delta_e\), where \(e=(1,\dots,1)\). Then \(GGC^n(0,b\delta_e)\) is the gamma subordinator on the diagonal ray and
\[
VGG^n(0,p,\Sigma,b\delta_e)=VG_n(b,p,\Sigma).
\]
This identifies variance-gamma as a special case of the broader variance generalised gamma convolution class [1712.03640][1609.04481].

## 3. Self-decomposability criteria and the role of drift

The central sufficient condition is Theorem 3.1 of Buchmann–Lu–Madan: if
\[
X\sim WVGG^n(d,\mu,\Sigma,\nu)
\quad\text{and}\quad
\mu=\mathbf 0,
\]
then \(X\) is self-decomposable in \(\mathbb R^n\). When \(\mu=0\), the characteristic exponent reduces to
\[
\Psi(\theta)
=
-\int_{[0,\infty)^n_*}
\ln\!\Bigl(\tfrac{\|u\|^2+\tfrac12\|\theta\|^2_\Sigma}{\|u\|^2}\Bigr)\,\nu(du),
\]
and the proof proceeds by approximating this law by finite superpositions of ordinary variance-gamma laws, using the facts that ordinary variance-gamma laws are self-decomposable and that the class of self-decomposable laws is closed under convolution and weak limits [1712.03640].

The corresponding necessity statement is formulated in Theorem 3.2. Let \(n\ge 2\), \(\Sigma\succ 0\), and \(\mu\neq 0\). If there exists a Borel subset \(B\subset S_{**}\subset S\) of positive surface measure such that, for all directions \(\theta\in B\), the two integrals
\[
\int_{(0,\infty)^n}A(\theta,u)\,\frac{\nu(du)}{D(\theta,u)}<\infty,
\qquad
\int_{(0,\infty)^n}E(\theta,u)\,\frac{\nu(du)}{D(\theta,u)}>0
\]
are finite and strictly positive, then \(X\) is not self-decomposable. A stronger sufficient integrability condition is
\[
\int_{(0,\infty)^n}\bigl(1+\|u\|^{1/2}\bigr)
\Bigl(\tfrac{\|u\|^n}{\prod_{k=1}^n u_k}\Bigr)^{1/2}\,\nu(du)<\infty,
\]
and this guarantees the preceding two conditions, hence non-self-decomposability whenever \(\mu\neq 0\) [1712.03640].

A common misconception is that self-decomposability is automatic for every variance-gamma-type weakly subordinated process. The one-dimensional gamma case shows a more specific picture. For a standard gamma subordinator \(G\sim\Gamma_S(a,b)\), the Thorin measure is
\[
\nu(du)=\frac{a}{u}e^{-bu}\,du,\qquad u>0,
\]
and
\[
\int_0^\infty u^{1/2}\,\nu(du)
=
a\int_0^\infty u^{-1/2}e^{-bu}\,du
=
a\,\Gamma\!\bigl(\tfrac12\bigr)\,b^{-1/2}
<\infty.
\]
Hence the classical variance-gamma process with no drift on \(B\) is self-decomposable. When a nonzero Gaussian drift \(\mu\neq 0\) is introduced, the same condition shows that non-zero drift breaks self-decomposability in all dimensions \(n\ge 2\) [1712.03640].

## 4. Deterministic scaling and scaled self-decomposable variance-gamma laws

Deterministic scaling preserves the variance generalised gamma convolution form. If
\[
Y\sim VGG^n(d,p,\Sigma,U)
\quad\text{and}\quad
c>0,
\]
define
\[
Y'_t=c\,Y_t.
\]
Then
\[
\Psi_{Y'}(\theta)=\Psi_Y(c\,\theta),
\]
and
\[
Y'\sim VGG^n\bigl(d,\;c\,p,\;c^2\,\Sigma,\;U\circ(u\mapsto u/c)\bigr).
\]
The same summary states that the resulting law is again self-decomposable for every \(c>0\), with Lévy–Khintchine data obtained by the same substitution in the formula of Theorem 4.1 [1609.04481].

This scaling rule isolates a precise sense in which a variance-gamma-type self-decomposable law remains within the same structural family after deterministic amplitude rescaling. A plausible implication is that scaling can be handled at the level of the Brownian drift, Brownian covariance, and Thorin measure without leaving the \(VGG^n\) class, which is useful when comparing parametrizations or normalizations across applications.

## 5. Gamma self-decomposability and the Variance Gamma++ process

Gardini–Sabino–Sasso introduce the Variance Gamma++ process by exploiting the self-decomposability of the gamma law. A distribution is self-decomposable if, for every \(a\in(0,1)\),
\[
X\stackrel d= aY+Z_a,
\]
with \(Y\stackrel d=X\) independent of the \(a\)-remainder \(Z_a\). For \(X\sim\Gamma(\alpha,\beta)\), the remainder satisfies
\[
\phi_{Z_a}(u)=\Bigl(\tfrac{\beta-i\,a\,u}{\beta-i\,u}\Bigr)^{\alpha}.
\]
The process \(\{Z_a(t);t\ge 0\}\) is constructed so that
\[
Z_a(t)\stackrel d=
\begin{cases}
\sum_{i=1}^{S(t)}X_i, & S(t)\sim \mathrm{Polya}(\alpha t,1-a),\; X_i\sim\mathrm{Exp}(\beta/a),\\[0.6em]
0, & S(t)=0,
\end{cases}
\]
and equivalently its Lévy density is
\[
\nu_{Z_a}(x)=\frac{\alpha}{x}\bigl(e^{-\beta x}-e^{-\beta x/a}\bigr)\,\mathbf 1_{x>0}(x).
\]
Because \(\int_0^\infty \nu_{Z_a}(x)\,dx<\infty\), \(Z_a\) is a compound-Poisson subordinator of finite activity [2106.15452].

The Variance Gamma++ process is then
\[
X(t)=\theta\,Z_a(t)+\sigma\,W(Z_a(t)),\qquad t\ge 0,
\]
where \(W_t\) is a Brownian motion with drift \(\theta\in\mathbb R\) and volatility \(\sigma>0\), independent of \(Z_a\). An equivalent integral form is
\[
X(t)=\int_0^{Z_a(t)}\theta\,du+\int_0^{Z_a(t)}\sigma\,dW(u).
\]
Since \(Z_a\) is nondecreasing, \(X\) is a pure-jump process of finite variation and finite activity. In this model one sets \(\kappa=a\in(0,1)\). As \(\kappa\to 0\), the remainder \(Z_a\) collapses to the classical gamma subordinator and one recovers the infinite-activity variance-gamma model. In practice, one may fix a variance-per-unit-time parameter \(\nu_0>0\) and choose
\[
\alpha=\frac1{\nu_0},\qquad \beta=\frac1{\nu_0},\qquad \kappa=a\in(0,1),
\]
so that the classical variance-gamma subordinator has \(\Gamma(t/\nu_0,\nu_0)\) law and \(Z_a(t)\) has the same first moment \(\mathbb E[Z_a(t)]=t\) [2106.15452].

## 6. Analytic representation, computation, and multivariate extension

For the Variance Gamma++ process, the characteristic triplet is \((0,b,\nu)\), with no continuous part,
\[
\nu(dx)=\nu(x)\,dx,
\qquad
b=\int_{|x|\le 1}x\,\nu(x)\,dx.
\]
Writing \(X=X^+-X^-\) as the difference of two independent Gamma++ subordinators with parameters \((a,\alpha,\beta_p)\) and \((a,\alpha,\beta_n)\), where
\[
\beta_{p,n}=\frac{\sqrt{\theta^2+2\sigma^2\beta}\,\mp\,\theta}{\sigma^2},
\]
the Lévy density is
\[
\nu(x)=\frac{\alpha}{x}\bigl(e^{-\beta_p x}-e^{-\beta_p x/a}\bigr),\qquad x>0,
\]
and
\[
\nu(x)=\frac{\alpha}{|x|}\bigl(e^{-\beta_n|x|}-e^{-\beta_n|x|/a}\bigr),\qquad x<0.
\]
The drift coefficient can be written in closed form but is most often absorbed into the martingale adjustment [2106.15452].

Its characteristic function is obtained from subordination. With
\[
\omega(u)=\theta\,u+i\,\tfrac{\sigma^2}{2}u^2,
\]
one has
\[
\phi_{X(t)}(u)=\mathbb E[e^{i\,u\,X(t)}]
=
\phi_{Z_a(t)}(\omega(u))
=
\Bigl(\frac{\beta-i\,a\,\omega(u)}{\beta-i\,\omega(u)}\Bigr)^{\alpha t},
\]
and therefore
\[
\psi_{X(t)}(u)=\log \phi_{X(t)}(u)
=
\alpha t\,\ln\!\Bigl(\tfrac{\beta-i\,a\,\omega(u)}{\beta-i\,\omega(u)}\Bigr).
\]
Because \(Z_a(t)\) is compound-Poisson with an atom at zero, \(X(t)\) also has an atom at zero, and the transition density is
\[
p_{X(t)}(x)
=
a^{\alpha t}\,\delta_0(x)
+
\sum_{k=1}^\infty
\binom{\alpha t+k-1}{k}\,a^{\alpha t}(1-a)^k\,f^{\mathrm{VG}_{k,\beta/a}}(x),
\]
where \(f^{\mathrm{VG}_{k,\beta/a}}(x)\) is the classical variance-gamma density with integer shape \(k\) and rate \(\beta/a\) [2106.15452].

Simulation is available both forward and backward in time. On a time grid \(0=t_0<t_1<\cdots<t_N=T\), forward simulation first samples \(\Delta Z_a\) either through a Polya-sum method or through a compound-Poisson representation with random rate, and then samples
\[
\Delta X_j\stackrel d=\mathcal N(\theta\,\Delta Z_a,\sigma^2\,\Delta Z_a).
\]
Backward simulation uses the Polya bridge for \(S(t)\), the gamma bridge for \(G\), and the Gaussian bridge for \(W\). In particular,
\[
S(t)\mid S(T)=k \sim \mathrm{BetaBinomial}(\alpha t,\alpha(T-t),k),
\]
\[
Z_a(t)\mid Z_a(T)=z_T \sim z_T\,\mathrm{Beta}(\alpha t,\alpha(T-t)),
\]
and
\[
X(t)\mid X(T)=x_T,\;Z_a(t)
\sim
\mathcal N\!\Bigl(
x_T\frac{Z_a(t)}{Z_a(T)},
\;
\sigma^2\frac{Z_a(t)\bigl(Z_a(T)-Z_a(t)\bigr)}{Z_a(T)}
\Bigr)
\]
[2106.15452].

Under the risk-neutral measure, one sets
\[
S(t)=S_0\exp\bigl(r\,t+\omega\,t+X(t)\bigr),
\]
with
\[
\omega=\alpha\, \ln\!\Bigl(\tfrac{\beta-(\theta+\frac12\sigma^2)}{\beta-a(\theta+\frac12\sigma^2)}\Bigr),
\]
so that \(\mathbb E[e^{X(t)+\omega t}]=1\). A European call with strike \(K\) and maturity \(T\) has price
\[
C(0,K)=e^{-rT}\,\mathbb E[(S(T)-K)^+],
\]
and Proposition 4.1 gives the integral-free representation
\[
C(0,K)
=
C_0\,a^{\alpha T}
+
\sum_{n=1}^\infty
\binom{\alpha T+n-1}{n}\,a^{\alpha T}(1-a)^n\,C^{\mathrm{VG}_{n,\beta/a}}(0,K),
\]
where
\[
C_0=\max\bigl(S_0e^{\omega T}-e^{-rT}K,0\bigr).
\]
Alternatively, the characteristic function may be inserted into a Carr–Madan or Lewis-type FFT inversion [2106.15452].

Parameter estimation is described through maximum likelihood and generalized method of moments. For log-returns \(\Delta X_j=X(t_j)-X(t_{j-1})\), the log-likelihood is
\[
\ell(\sigma,\theta,\alpha,a)
=
\sum_{j=1}^N
\ln\!\Bigl[
a^{\alpha\Delta t}\,\delta_0(\Delta X_j)
+
\sum_{k=1}^\infty
\binom{\alpha\Delta t+k-1}{k}\,a^{\alpha\Delta t}(1-a)^k
\,f^{\mathrm{VG}_{k,\beta/a}}(\Delta X_j)
\Bigr],
\]
to be maximized numerically with respect to \((\sigma,\theta,\alpha,a)\). The generalized method of moments matches cumulants \(c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4,\dots\), using
\[
c_n(X(\Delta t))
=
\alpha\,\Delta t\,
\Bigl[
\frac1{\beta_p^n}-\frac1{(\beta_p/a)^n}
+(-1)^n\Bigl(\frac1{\beta_n^n}-\frac1{(\beta_n/a)^n}\Bigr)
\Bigr](n-1)! .
\]
A multivariate extension is obtained by taking independent Gamma++ processes \(X_i(t)\sim \Gamma^{++}(a,\alpha_i t,\beta/c_i)\), an independent common factor \(Z_a(t)\sim \Gamma^{++}(a,\alpha t,\beta)\), and defining
\[
H_i(t)=X_i(t)+c_i\,Z_a(t).
\]
Then each \(H_i(t)\sim \Gamma^{++}(a,(\alpha_i+\alpha)t,\beta/c_i)\), while dependence is induced through the common subordinator \(Z_a\). Time-changing independent Brownian motions by \(H_i\) yields a multivariate Variance Gamma++ process with the same marginal laws and a parsimonious dependence structure [2106.15452].

Source: https://www.emergentmind.com/topics/variance-gamma-scaled-self-decomposable-process