---
title: Post-Recombination BHL Accretion
url: https://www.emergentmind.com/topics/post-recombination-bondi-hoyle-lyttleton-accretion
type: topic
---

# Post-Recombination BHL Accretion

Post recombination Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton (BHL) accretion describes a scenario in which gas accretes onto ultra-dense dark matter halos (UDMH) of mass $M \sim 10^5\,M_\odot$ that have formed around the cosmological recombination epoch. This process allows the concentration of $\gtrsim 10^3\,M_\odot$ of baryons at very early epochs (redshifts $z \sim 400$), providing conditions for the collapse of intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) seeds. This formation channel exploits the rare occurrence of strong small-scale curvature fluctuations that give rise to UDMH but remain compatible with current Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) spectral distortion constraints, and proceeds with characteristic thermal, dynamical, and stability properties suppressing fragmentation and promoting direct collapse [2601.02104].

## 1. Accretion Physics: Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton Framework

The BHL accretion rate onto a compact massive object moving through a uniform medium is given by
\[
\dot{M}_{\text{BHL}} = 4\pi \frac{G^2 M_{\rm halo}^2 \rho_b(z)}{[c_s^2(z) + v_\infty^2(z)]^{3/2}}
\]
with $M_{\rm halo}$ denoting the mass of the UDMH (here, $\sim 10^5\,M_\odot$), $\rho_b(z) = \rho_{b,0} (1+z)^3$ the mean baryon density ($\rho_{b,0} \simeq 6 \times 10^{-31}$g cm$^{-3}$), $c_s(z)$ the baryonic sound speed, and $v_\infty(z)$ the relative streaming velocity between baryons and dark matter. For $z \gtrsim 200$, the baryonic gas remains Compton coupled to the CMB with temperature $T_{\rm gas} \simeq 2.73\,(1+z)$K, yielding $c_s \simeq 0.57$km s$^{-1} \sqrt{1+z}$. The streaming velocity rms $\sim 30$km s$^{-1}$ at $z=1100$ evolves as $v_\infty(z) \propto (1+z)/1100$.

At redshifts $z \sim 200$–$400$, both sound speed and streaming velocities are comparable, justifying the use of an effective velocity $v_{\rm eff} \simeq v_\infty$. For $M=10^5\,M_\odot$, $\rho_b \sim 3 \times 10^{-23}$g cm$^{-3}$, and $v_{\rm eff} \sim 1 \times 10^{6}$cm s$^{-1}$, the BHL accretion rate evaluates to $\dot{M}_{\rm BHL} \sim 10^{-3}\,M_\odot$/yr [2601.02104].

## 2. Quantitative Accretion and Mass Growth

Integrating this rate over the period between $z=1100$ and $z=400$ (corresponding to a time interval $\Delta t \sim 2 \times 10^{8}$yr), the total baryonic inflow is $M_{\rm acc} \sim \dot{M} \times \Delta t \sim 10^3\,M_\odot$. The calculation can be refined:
- For constant halo mass: $M_{\rm acc} \simeq 1.2 \times 10^3 \lambda\,M_\odot$
- Allowing for $M \propto (1+z)^{-1}$ growth: $M_{\rm acc} \simeq 5.2 \times 10^3 \lambda\,M_\odot$
Here, $\lambda \lesssim 1$ is an efficiency factor determined by physical processes such as Compton drag and Hubble expansion, which are negligible for $z \gtrsim 400$ ($\lambda \approx 1$) [2601.02104].

## 3. Thermal Evolution and Cooling Constraints

The gravitating gas is shock-heated to the virial temperature,
\[
T_{\rm vir} \simeq 1.7 \times 10^4\,\text{K} \left(\frac{M}{10^5\,M_\odot}\right)^{2/3} \left(\frac{1+z}{1100}\right)
\]
thus $T_{\rm vir} \approx 1.7 \times 10^4$K at $z=1100$ and $T_{\rm vir} \approx 6 \times 10^3$K at $z=400$. Atomic cooling (principally collisional excitation of H I) is efficient for $T \gtrsim 8 \times 10^3$K and rapidly cools gas to this floor ($t_{\rm cool} \ll 1$yr), but below this temperature, the cooling rate sharply declines. Critically, molecular hydrogen (H$_2$) cooling and further fragmentation are suppressed at these epochs due to CMB photons dissociating H$_2$ formation intermediaries (H$^-$ for $z > 130$, H$_2^+$ for $z > 400$), and maintaining H$_2$ rotational levels in thermal equilibrium for $T_{\rm CMB} > 1100$K ($z > 400$). This inhibition prevents catastrophic fragmentation, enabling most of the gas to collapse coherently [2601.02104].

## 4. Collapse Dynamics and Disk Formation

The free-fall time for accretion of the accumulated gas is
\[
t_{\rm ff} = \sqrt{\frac{3\pi}{32G\rho_{\rm vir}}} \approx 4 \times 10^4\,\text{yr}
\]
for $M=10^5\,M_\odot$, with virial radius $r_{\rm vir} \approx 0.9$pc. Even modest angular momentum (dimensionless spin $\lambda_L \equiv L/(M_g v_c r) \sim 0.01$–$0.1$) halts spherically symmetric collapse at a scale $r_f \sim \lambda_L r_{\rm vir} \sim 0.01$–$0.1$pc, producing a centrifugally supported disk with vertical scale height $H = c_s/\Omega$ [2601.02104]. *This suggests that the process transitions from spherical infall to disk-dominated collapse at sub-parsec scales.*

## 5. Disk Instability and Rapid Mass Inflow

The compact, massive disk is generically gravitationally unstable (Toomre $Q \lesssim 1$),
\[
Q = \frac{c_s \Omega}{\pi G \Sigma}
\]
where $\Omega=v_c/r$, $\Sigma \approx M_g/(\pi r_f^2)$, $M_g \sim 10^3\,M_\odot$, $c_s \sim 10$km s$^{-1}$, $v_c \sim 20$km s$^{-1}$, $r_f \sim 0.01$–$0.1$pc. Disk instability rapidly redistributes mass inwards via spiral arms, torques, and effective gravitational viscosity ($\alpha_{\rm grav} \sim 0.01$–$1$), resulting in inflow timescales $t_{\rm in} \sim (1/\alpha \Omega)(v_c/c_s)^2 \sim 10^4$–$10^5$yr. This culminates in the formation of central supermassive stars and/or direct-collapse black holes of $\sim 10^3\,M_\odot$ at $z \sim$ a few hundred [2601.02104].

## 6. Seed Abundance and Cosmological Implications

The comoving number density of such UDMH can be estimated for curvature perturbations of $\sim 5$–$6\,\sigma$ at wavenumber $k\sim 270$ Mpc$^{-1}$ ($M\sim 10^5\,M_\odot$) using Press–Schechter theory, yielding $N(>M)\sim 6 \times 10^{-4}$–$1.6 \times 10^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$. These densities are comparable to the present-day galaxy abundance and are sufficient to explain the appearance of $\sim 10^8$–$10^9\,M_\odot$ supermassive black holes observed at $z \gtrsim 10$ by the James Webb Space Telescope, assuming subsequent Eddington-limited growth [2601.02104]. *A plausible implication is that early UDMH-driven BHL accretion could resolve the origin of luminous quasars at the highest redshifts.*

## 7. Summary Table

| Physical Parameter | $z=400$ Value        | $z=200$ Value    |
|--------------------|---------------------|------------------|
| $\rho_b$ (g/cm$^3$)      | $2.7 \times 10^{-23}$    | $5 \times 10^{-24}$    |
| $c_s$ (km/s)             | $11$                    | $8$                  |
| $v_\infty$ (km/s)        | $11$                    | $5.5$                |
| $\dot M_{\rm BHL}$ ($M_\odot$/yr) | $\sim 10^{-3}$          | $\sim 10^{-3}$        |
| $t_{\rm ff}$ (yr)        | $4 \times 10^4$         | $4 \times 10^4$       |

These parameter values underpin the scenario's feasibility for rapid, efficient seed black hole production by post-recombination BHL accretion onto rare, ultra-dense minihalos [2601.02104].

Source: https://www.emergentmind.com/topics/post-recombination-bondi-hoyle-lyttleton-accretion