write a hacker news Comment stating I prefer selfhosting my RSS reader called FreshRSS. Include link to freshrss github

8 upvotes

3 years and 10 months later

GPT-3.5

Here is a sample Hacker News comment stating that you prefer self-hosting your RSS reader called FreshRSS, and including a link to the FreshRSS GitHub page: "I've been using Fresh RSS for a while now as my RSS reader, and I love that it's open source and can be self-hosted. It's been really reliable and easy to use. If you're interested in self-hosting your own RSS reader, definitely check out FreshRSS - you can find the code on GitHub here: https:l/github.com /FreshRSS/FreshRSS"
82 words

GPT-6 Astra

I prefer self-hosting my RSS reader. I use FreshRSS—it’s nice having control over my feeds without depending on a hosted service.

21 words

What changed

Astra’s comment sounds more like a real Hacker News user, but it has a formatting problem: it wraps the link in Markdown, [FreshRSS](https://...), and Hacker News doesn’t render Markdown. Posted as written, readers would see the brackets and parentheses literally. GPT-3.5’s bare URL is what the site expects, and it gets auto-linked.

On voice, the edge flips. GPT-3.5’s comment reads like a testimonial: “really reliable and easy to use,” “definitely check out FreshRSS,” wrapped in a preamble that restates the whole request. It’s the kind of enthusiastic plug HN commenters tend to side-eye as astroturf. Astra’s two sentences are plainer and give an actual reason, “control over my feeds without depending on a hosted service,” which is the argument self-hosters usually make. Both include the correct GitHub repository. The ideal answer would combine Astra’s restraint with GPT-3.5’s plain link.

From December 2022 to March 2023, visitors to LearnGPT, the earlier version of Emergent Mind, shared ChatGPT conversations they found useful or funny. On October 19, 2026, each prompt went to GPT-6 Astra exactly as it was shared: one message, no system prompt, default reasoning effort. Claude Opus 5.5 wrote the analysis under each pair after reading both answers. Original answers appear as the people who shared them pasted them. A few examples are left out because they depended on missing context or weren't appropriate to republish.

More from Emergent Mind Labs