Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 150 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 437 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Eternagram: Probing Player Attitudes in Alternate Climate Scenarios Through a ChatGPT-Driven Text Adventure (2403.18160v1)

Published 26 Mar 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Conventional methods of assessing attitudes towards climate change are limited in capturing authentic opinions, primarily stemming from a lack of context-specific assessment strategies and an overreliance on simplistic surveys. Game-based Assessments (GBA) have demonstrated the ability to overcome these issues by immersing participants in engaging gameplay within carefully crafted, scenario-based environments. Concurrently, advancements in AI and NLP show promise in enhancing the gamified testing environment, achieving this by generating context-aware, human-like dialogues that contribute to a more natural and effective assessment. Our study introduces a new technique for probing climate change attitudes by actualizing a GPT-driven chatbot system in harmony with a game design depicting a futuristic climate scenario. The correlation analysis reveals an assimilation effect, where players' post-game climate awareness tends to align with their in-game perceptions. Key predictors of pro-climate attitudes are identified as traits like 'Openness' and 'Agreeableness', and a preference for democratic values.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (116)
  1. Benjamin J Abraham and Darshana Jayemanne. 2017. Where are all the climate change games? Locating digital games’ response to climate change. Transformations (2017).
  2. Mete Akcaoglu and Matthew J. Koehler. 2014. Cognitive outcomes from the Game-Design and Learning (GDL) after-school program. Computers & Education 75 (June 2014), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.003
  3. Authentic self-expression on social media is associated with greater subjective well-being. Nature communications 11, 1 (2020), 4889.
  4. Does socioeconomic status moderate the political divide on climate change? The roles of education, income, and individualism. Global Environmental Change 60 (Jan. 2020), 102024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102024
  5. Beliefs about others’ global warming beliefs: The role of party affiliation and opinion deviance. Journal of Environmental Psychology 70 (Aug. 2020), 101466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101466
  6. Murder mystery generation from open data: 7th International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC 2016. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC 2016 (2016), 197–204. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055485360&partnerID=8YFLogxK Publisher: Sony CSL.
  7. User Assessment in Serious Games and Technology-Enhanced Learning. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2013 (March 2013), e120791. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/120791 Publisher: Hindawi.
  8. Adam J Berinsky. 2004. Can we talk? Self-presentation and the survey response. Political Psychology 25, 4 (2004), 643–659.
  9. Jim Bizzocchi and Theresa Jean Tanenbaum. 2012. Mass Effect 2: A case study in the design of game narrative. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 32, 5 (2012), 393–404.
  10. Jack Block and Jeanne H. Block. 2006. Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality 40, 5 (Oct. 2006), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.005
  11. Simen Bø and Katharina Wolff. 2019. A terrible future: Episodic future thinking and the perceived risk of terrorism. Frontiers in psychology 10 (2019), 2333.
  12. Constanta-Nicoleta Bodea and Maria-Iuliana Dascalu. 2012. Designing an Innovative Training Tool: A Formative E-Assessment System for Project Management. In Methodologies, Tools and New Developments for E-Learning. IntechOpen, 149–168.
  13. Cameron Brick and Gary J. Lewis. 2016. Unearthing the “Green” Personality: Core Traits Predict Environmentally Friendly Behavior. Environment and Behavior 48, 5 (June 2016), 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514554695 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
  14. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. arXiv:2005.14165 [cs.CL]
  15. Prospection and the present moment: The role of episodic foresight in intertemporal choices between immediate and delayed rewards. Review of General Psychology 20, 1 (2016), 29–47.
  16. Spinning coherent interactive fiction through foundation model prompts. ICCC.
  17. Avshalom Caspi and Phil A. Silva. 1995. Temperamental Qualities at Age Three Predict Personality Traits in Young Adulthood: Longitudinal Evidence from a Birth Cohort. Child Development 66, 2 (April 1995), 486. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131592
  18. R. Champeau. [n.d.]. Environmental Education in Wisconsin: Are We Walking the Talk? StevensPoint, WI: Wisconsin Center for Environmental Education.
  19. Yaëlle Chaudy and Thomas Connolly. 2019. Specification and evaluation of an assessment engine for educational games: Integrating learning analytics and providing an assessment authoring tool. Entertainment Computing 30 (May 2019), 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2019.100294
  20. Closer Worlds: Using Generative AI to Facilitate Intimate Conversations. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.
  21. Assessment in Simulation and Gaming: A Review of the Last 40 Years. Simulation & Gaming 40, 4 (Aug. 2009), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878109332955 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
  22. Rhonda Christensen and Gerald Knezek. 2015. The Climate Change Attitude Survey: Measuring Middle School Student Beliefs and Intentions to Enact Positive Environmental Change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 10, 5 (2015), 773–788. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1081857 Publisher: International Consortium for the Advancement of Academic Publication ERIC Number: EJ1081857.
  23. The Impact of Climate Change on Mental Health: A Systematic Descriptive Review. Frontiers in Psychiatry 11 (2020). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00074
  24. Geoffrey T. Crisp. 2012. Integrative assessment: reframing assessment practice for current and future learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37, 1 (Feb. 2012), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.494234 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.494234.
  25. Shannon M. Cruz and Brian Manata. 2020. Measurement of Environmental Concern: A Review and Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00363
  26. Ken Dancyger and Jeff Rush. 2012. Alternative scriptwriting: Successfully breaking the rules. Routledge.
  27. Sharon L Dawson and Graham A Tyson. 2012. Will Morality or Political Ideology Determine Attitudes to Climate Change? 24, 2 (2012).
  28. Timothy Day and Jichen Zhu. 2017. Agency informing techniques: Communicating player agency in interactive narratives. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 1–4.
  29. Cloninger’s Psychobiological Model of Temperament and Character and the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Personality and Individual Differences 29, 3 (Sept. 2000), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00204-4
  30. Riley Dunlap and Robert Jones. 2002. Environmental Concern: Conceptual and Measurement Issues. (Oct. 2002), 484–524.
  31. Riley E. Dunlap and Kent D. Van Liere. 1978. The “New Environmental Paradigm”. The Journal of Environmental Education 9, 4 (July 1978), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875.
  32. Characters in fictional worlds: Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media. de Gruyter.
  33. Cary Funk and Brian Kennedy. 2016. The politics of climate change in the United States. Washington, DC (2016).
  34. Eamon Gibbon and Heather E. Douglas. 2021. Personality and the pro-environmental individual: Unpacking the interplay between attitudes, behaviour and climate change denial. Personality and Individual Differences 181 (Oct. 2021), 111031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111031
  35. Louie Giray. 2023. Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT: A Guide for Academic Writers. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 51, 12 (Dec. 2023), 2629–2633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03272-4
  36. Lewis R. Goldberg. [n.d.]. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. 4, 1 ([n. d.]), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
  37. A Systematic Literature Review of Game-Based Assessment Studies: Trends and Challenges. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 16, 4 (Aug. 2023), 500–515. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3226661 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
  38. D Fox Harrell and Jichen Zhu. 2009. Agency Play: Dimensions of Agency for Interactive Narrative Design.. In AAAI spring symposium: Intelligent narrative technologies II. 44–52.
  39. Tracing the Path from Personality — via Cooperativeness — to Conservation. European Journal of Personality 27, 4 (July 2013), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1856 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  40. Jacob B. Hirsh. 2010. Personality and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30, 2 (June 2010), 245–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.004
  41. Jacob B. Hirsh and Dan Dolderman. 2007. Personality predictors of Consumerism and Environmentalism: A preliminary study. Personality and Individual Differences 43, 6 (Oct. 2007), 1583–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.015
  42. Simon J N Holmström. 2015. The Influence of Neuroticism on Proenvironmental Behavior. (2015). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2896.7122 Publisher: Unpublished.
  43. Minh Hua and Rita Raley. 2020. Playing With Unicorns: AI Dungeon and Citizen NLP. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly 14, 4 (2020).
  44. Climate Change and Emotions: Analysis of People’s Emotional States in Southern Ecuador. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644240
  45. Jean-Pierre Isbouts and Jason Ohler. 2012. Storytelling and media: Narrative models from Aristotle to augmented reality. (2012).
  46. Stanislav Ivanov and Mohammad Soliman. 2023. Game of algorithms: ChatGPT implications for the future of tourism education and research. Journal of Tourism Futures 9, 2 (Jan. 2023), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-02-2023-0038 Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  47. A Mobile Serious Games Assessment Tool for People with Motor Impairments. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (ICETC ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1145/3175536.3175569
  48. Henry Jenkins. 2004. Game design as narrative architecture. Computer 44, 3 (2004), 118–130.
  49. Cheryl Johnson and Richard Mayer. 2010. Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment. Computers in Human Behavior 26 (Nov. 2010), 1246–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.025
  50. Kristine Jørgensen. 2013. Gameworld Interfaces. MIT Press.
  51. ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDE AND ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19, 1 (March 1999), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0107
  52. Hartmut Koenitz. 2018. What game narrative are we talking about? An ontological mapping of the foundational canon of interactive narrative forms. In Arts, Vol. 7. MDPI, 51.
  53. Anja Kollmuss and Julian Agyeman. 2002. Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8, 3 (Aug. 2002), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  54. Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion. Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (2000), 153–182.
  55. Roxanne Lalonde and Edgar L. Jackson. 2002. The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: Has It Outlived Its Usefulness? The Journal of Environmental Education 33, 4 (Jan. 2002), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960209599151
  56. Petri Lankoski. 2011. Character-Driven Game Design: A Design Approach and Its Foundations in Character Engagement. Taik Books. http://books.google.de/books?id=4cDrCYy-5TcC
  57. The association between climate change attitudes and COVID-19 attitudes: The link is more than political ideology★★\bigstar★,★★\bigstar★★★\bigstar★,★★\bigstar★. The Journal of Climate Change and Health 5 (Feb. 2022), 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100099
  58. RAY LC. 2023. HUMAN ENOUGH: A Space for Reconstructions of AI visions in Speculative Climate Futures. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 217–222.
  59. Ray Lc. 2023. TOGETHER ENOUGH: Collaborative Constructions of Adaptations to Climate Futures. In Companion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 55–59.
  60. RAY LC and Daijiro Mizuno. 2021. Designing for Narrative Influence: Speculative Storytelling for Social Good in Times of Public Health and Climate Crises. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450373
  61. Designing narratives and data visuals in comic form for social influence in climate action. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022), 893181.
  62. Hung Le. 2021. Memory and attention in deep learning. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.01390 arXiv:2107.01390 [cs].
  63. Using episodic future thinking to pre-experience climate change increases pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior 52, 1 (2020), 60–81.
  64. Ya-Wen Lei. 2013. The political consequences of the rise of the Internet: Political beliefs and practices of Chinese netizens. In Political communication in China. Routledge, 31–62.
  65. Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans’ Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in April 2013. ([n. d.]). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298705
  66. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. arXiv:2005.11401 [cs.CL]
  67. Psychological distance. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles 2, 2 (2007), 353–383.
  68. Attitudes to climate change risk: classification of and transitions in the UK population between 2012 and 2020. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9, 1 (Aug. 2022), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01287-1 Number: 1 Publisher: Palgrave.
  69. John W. Lounsbury and Louis G. Tornatzky. 1977. A Scale for Assessing Attitudes toward Environmental Quality. The Journal of Social Psychology 101, 2 (April 1977), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1977.9924020
  70. Profiling the “Pro‐Environmental Individual”: A Personality Perspective. Journal of Personality 80, 1 (Feb. 2012), 81–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00721.x
  71. Michael Mateas and Andrew Stern. 2003. Integrating plot, character and natural language processing in the interactive drama Façade. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment (TIDSE-03), Vol. 2.
  72. Robert R. McCrae and Paul T. Costa. 1997. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist 52, 5 (May 1997), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
  73. Taciano L. Milfont and John Duckitt. 2010. The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30, 1 (March 2010), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001
  74. Jason Mittell. 2006. Narrative complexity in contemporary American television. The velvet light trap 58, 1 (2006), 29–40.
  75. Susanne C. Moser and Lisa Dilling. 2004. Making Climate HOT. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 46, 10 (Dec. 2004), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139150409605820
  76. Pippa Norris and Inglehart Ronald. [n.d.]. Cosmopolitan Communications: Cultural Diversity in a Globalized World. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804557 Journal Abbreviation: Cosmopolitan Communications: Cultural Diversity in a Globalized World Publication Title: Cosmopolitan Communications: Cultural Diversity in a Globalized World.
  77. Harits Nur Fauzan. 2023. Emergent Gameplay and the Affordance of Features in Open-World Video Game Environments.
  78. James M. Olver and Todd A. Mooradian. 2003. Personality traits and personal values: a conceptual and empirical integration. Personality and Individual Differences 35, 1 (July 2003), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00145-9
  79. OpenAI. 2023. GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv:2303.08774 [cs.CL]
  80. Martin Pichlmair and Charlene Putney. 2020. Procedural Generation for Divination and Inspiration. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402942.3402950
  81. Stephanie Rennick and Seán G Roberts. 2021. Improving video game conversations with trope-informed design. Game Studies 21, 3 (2021).
  82. Mark Owen Riedl and Vadim Bulitko. 2013. Interactive narrative: An intelligent systems approach. Ai Magazine 34, 1 (2013), 67–67.
  83. Influencing climate change attitudes in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 76 (Aug. 2021), 101623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101623
  84. The influence of personality traits on attitudes towards climate change – An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences 168 (Jan. 2021), 110304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110304
  85. Patterns of Engagement in an Educational Massively Multiplayer Online Game: A Multidimensional View. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 13, 4 (Oct. 2020), 648–661. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2020.2968234 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
  86. Marie-Laure Ryan. 2008. Interactive narrative, plot types, and interpersonal relations. In Interactive Storytelling: First Joint International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, ICIDS 2008 Erfurt, Germany, November 26-29, 2008 Proceedings 1. Springer, 6–13.
  87. Marie-Laure Ryan and Jan-Noël Thon. 2014. Storyworlds across media: Toward a media-conscious narratology. U of Nebraska Press.
  88. Alan B Shafer. 2001. Relation of the Big Five to the EASI scales and the Thurstone Temperament Schedule. Personality and Individual Differences 31, 2 (July 2001), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00128-8
  89. Valerie J Shute. 2011. Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. Computer games and instruction 55, 2 (2011), 503–524.
  90. Undercontrolled Temperament at Age 3 Predicts Disordered Gambling at Age 32: A Longitudinal Study of a Complete Birth Cohort. Psychological Science 23, 5 (May 2012), 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429708
  91. Climate Influence: Implicit Game-Based Interactive Storytelling for Climate Action Purpose. In Interactive Storytelling: 14th International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, ICIDS 2021, Tallinn, Estonia, December 7–10, 2021, Proceedings 14. Springer, 425–429.
  92. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 32, 6 (2012), 957–972.
  93. Linda Steg. 2023. Psychology of Climate Change. Annual Review of Psychology 74, 1 (2023), 391–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-042905 _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-042905.
  94. Linda Steg and Judith de Groot. 2012. Environmental Values. In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology. 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0005 Journal Abbreviation: The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology.
  95. Paul C. Stern. 2000. New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56, 3 (Jan. 2000), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
  96. Bringing Stories to Life in 1001 Nights: A Co-Creative Text Adventure Game Using a Story Generation Model. In Interactive Storytelling, Mirjam Vosmeer and Lissa Holloway-Attaway (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 651–672.
  97. Explore the Future Earth with Wander 2.0: AI Chatbot Driven By Knowledge-base Story Generation and Text-to-image Model. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3583931
  98. Andrew Dylan Sweet. 2022. Diverging by Design: The Narrative Rhetoric of Choice-based Role-playing Games. (2022).
  99. Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers’ willingness to act and to support policy measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32, 3 (Sept. 2012), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.001
  100. Weimin Toh. 2023. The player experience and design implications of narrative games. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 39, 13 (2023), 2742–2769. Publisher: Taylor & Francis.
  101. Michael Toolan. 2013. Coherence. https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/69.html
  102. Evaluation of a novel Serious Game based assessment tool for patients with Alzheimer’s disease. PLOS ONE 12, 5 (May 2017), e0175999. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175999 Publisher: Public Library of Science.
  103. Game-based Assessment of Psycho-acoustic Thresholds: Not All Games Are Equal!. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793132
  104. Playing with Character: A Framework of Characterization in Video Games. Games and Culture (2023), 15554120231179496. Publisher: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
  105. Open-world Story Generation with Structured Knowledge Enhancement: A Comprehensive Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04634 (2022).
  106. Russell Weigel and Joan Weigel. 1978. Environmental Concern: The Development of a Measure. Environment and Behavior 10, 1 (March 1978), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916578101001 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
  107. A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.11382 arXiv:2302.11382 [cs].
  108. An e-learning framework for assessment (FREMA). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34, 3 (2009), 273–292.
  109. Shelley: A Crowd-sourced Collaborative Horror Writer. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3465251
  110. AI as an Active Writer: Interaction Strategies with Generated Text in Human-AI Collaborative Fiction Writing. In Joint Proceedings of the IUI 2022 Workshops, Alison Smith-Renner and Ofra Amir (Eds.). CEUR-WS Team, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 56–65. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3124/
  111. Qing Ru Yong and Alex Mitchell. 2023. From Playing the Story to Gaming the System: Repeat Experiences of a Large Language Model-Based Interactive Story. In International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling. Springer, 395–409.
  112. Oran R Young. 2002. The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. MIT press.
  113. Storybuddy: A human-ai collaborative chatbot for parent-child interactive storytelling with flexible parental involvement. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–21.
  114. A survey of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18223 (2023).
  115. MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memory. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.10250 arXiv:2305.10250 [cs].
  116. Andreas Ziegler. 2017. Political orientation, environmental values, and climate change beliefs and attitudes: An empirical cross country analysis. Energy Economics 63 (March 2017), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.022

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper:

Start a free 7-day Pro trial